Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30125279›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Antibacterial soap use impacts skin microbial communities in rural Madagascar.

James J Yu, Melissa B Manus, Olaf Mueller, Sarah C Windsor, Julie E Horvath, Charles L Nunn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Vulvar Care: Reviewing Concepts in Daily Hygiene.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Interactions with alloparents are associated with the diversity of infant skin and fecal bacterial communities in Chicago, United States.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The Different Facets of Triclocarban: A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

James J YuDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9967-8449
Melissa B ManusDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Olaf MuellerDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Sarah C WindsorGenomics & Microbiology Research Lab, North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Julie E HorvathDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Charles L NunnDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Duke University · USNorth Carolina Central University · USNorth Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The skin harbors diverse communities of microorganisms, and alterations to these communities can impact the effectiveness of the skin as a barrier to infectious organisms or injury. As the global availability and adoption of antibacterial products increases, it is important to understand how these products affect skin microbial communities of people living in rural areas of developing countries, where risks of infection and injury often differ from urban populations in developed countries. We investigated the effect of antibacterial soap on skin microbial communities in a rural Malagasy population that practices subsistence agriculture in the absence of electricity and running water. We quantified the amount of soap used by each participant and obtained skin swab samples at three time points: prior to soap use, immediately after one week of soap use, and two weeks after soap use was discontinued. Soap use did not significantly impact ecological measures of diversity and richness (alpha diversity). However, the amount of soap used was a predictor of community-level change (beta diversity), with changes persisting for at least two weeks after subjects stopped using soap. Our results indicate that the overall species richness of skin microbial communities may be resistant to short-term use of antibacterial soap in settings characterized by regular contact with the natural environment, yet these communities may undergo shifts in microbial composition. Lifestyle changes associated with the use of antibacterial soap may therefore cause rapid alterations in skin microbial communities, with the potential for effects on skin health.

Indexed as

Hand DisinfectionSoapsAdolescentAdultAgedAgricultureAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiodiversityDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansMadagascarMaleMicrobiotaMiddle AgedRural PopulationSkinAnti-Bacterial AgentsSoaps

Identifiers

PMID30125279
PMCPMC6101359
OpenAlexW2888529985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.