Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30125268›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2018

Efficient base editing in methylated regions with a human APOBEC3A-Cas9 fusion.

Xiao Wang, Jianan Li, Ying Wang, Bei Yang, Jia Wei, Jing Wu, Ruixuan Wang, Xingxu Huang, Jia Chen, Li Yang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 167 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
167citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

167 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 265 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Compact 9dBEs Enable Efficient and Precise Genome Editing in Mammalian Cells and In Vivo.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

107 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiao WangSchool of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.
Jianan LiSchool of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.
Ying WangKey Laboratory of Computational Biology, CAS-MPG Partner Institute for Computational Biology, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Bei YangShanghai Institute for Advanced Immunochemical Studies, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5389-3859
Jia WeiKey Laboratory of Computational Biology, CAS-MPG Partner Institute for Computational Biology, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Jing WuSchool of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.
Ruixuan WangSchool of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.
Xingxu HuangSchool of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.
Jia ChenSchool of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4242-2899
Li YangKey Laboratory of Computational Biology, CAS-MPG Partner Institute for Computational Biology, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8833-7473
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNShanghaiTech University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Base editors (BEs) enable the generation of targeted single-nucleotide mutations, but currently used rat APOBEC1-based BEs are relatively inefficient in editing cytosines in highly methylated regions or in GpC contexts. By screening a variety of APOBEC and AID deaminases, we show that human APOBEC3A-conjugated BEs and versions we engineered to have narrower editing windows can mediate efficient C-to-T base editing in regions with high methylation levels and GpC dinucleotide content.

Indexed as

Base SequenceCRISPR-Associated Protein 9Cytidine DeaminaseDNADNA MethylationGene EditingHEK293 CellsHumansMutagenesis, Site-DirectedProteinsAPOBEC3A protein, humanCRISPR-Associated Protein 9Cytidine DeaminaseDNAProteins

Identifiers

PMID30125268
OpenAlexW2888342080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.