ArticleJournal of radiation research2018
Radiation quality effects alteration in COX-2 pathway to trigger radiation-induced bystander response in A549 lung carcinoma cells.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiation-induced rescue effect on human breast carcinoma cells is regulated by macrophages.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Targets for protection and mitigation of radiation injury.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020Review
- P2 Receptors as Therapeutic Targets in the Salivary Gland: From Physiology to Dysfunction.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
- Genomic Instability and Carcinogenesis of Heavy Charged Particles Radiation: Clinical and Environmental Implications.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine whether the radiation-induced bystander effect (RIBE) is affected by radiation quality. To mimic the different radiation qualities of the direct action (D)/indirect action (ID) ratio, A549 cells were exposed to X-rays, with either 100 mM of the radical scavenger, thio-urea (TU+), or null (TU-). Biological responses in irradiated and bystander cells were compared at equal lethal effects of a 6% survival dose, which was estimated from the survival curves to be 8 Gy and 5 Gy for TU+ and TU-, respectively. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression in TU- irradiated cells increased up to 8 h post-irradiation, before decreasing towards 24 h. The concentration of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), a primary product of COX-2 and known as a secreted inducible factor in RIBE, increased over 3-fold compared with that in the control at 8 h post-irradiation. Conversely, COX-2 expression and PGE2 production of TU+ irradiated cells were drastically suppressed. These results show that the larger D/ID suppressed COX-2 expression and PGE2 production in irradiated cells. However, in contrast to the case in the irradiated cells, COX-2 expression was equally observed in the TU- and TU+ co-cultured bystander cells, which showed the highest expression levels at 24 h post-irradiation. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that radiation quality, such as the D/ID ratio, may be an important factor in the alteration of signalling pathways involved in RIBE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.