ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2018
Development and validation of a predictive ecological model for TB prevalence.
Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Among Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2021Pooled it
- Subnational burden estimates to find missing people with tuberculosis: wrong but useful?BMC global and public health · 2024Review
- The burden of tuberculosis among adolescents and young adults in five Asian countries from 1990 to 2019.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023Article
- TB Hackathon: Development and Comparison of Five Models to Predict Subnational Tuberculosis Prevalence in Pakistan.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022Article
- An Ecological Study of Tuberculosis Incidence in China, From 2002 to 2018.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Association between economic development level and tuberculosis registered incidence in Shandong, China.BMC public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Nationally representative tuberculosis (TB) prevalence surveys provide invaluable empirical measurements of TB burden but are a massive and complex undertaking. Therefore, methods that capitalize on data from these surveys are both attractive and imperative. The aim of this study was to use existing TB prevalence estimates to develop and validate an ecological predictive statistical model to indirectly estimate TB prevalence in low- and middle-income countries without survey data. Methods: We included national and subnational estimates from 30 nationally representative surveys and 2 district-level surveys in India, resulting in 50 data points for model development (training set). Ecological predictors included TB notification and programmatic data, co-morbidities and socio-environmental factors extracted from online data repositories. A random-effects multivariable binomial regression model was developed using the training set and was used to predict bacteriologically confirmed TB prevalence in 63 low- and middle-income countries across Africa and Asia in 2015. Results: Out of the 111 ecological predictors considered, 14 were retained for model building (due to incompleteness or collinearity). The final model retained for predictions included five predictors: continent, percentage retreated cases out of all notified, all forms TB notification rates per 100 000 population, population density and proportion of the population under the age of 15. Cross-fold validations in the training set showed very good average fit (R-sq = 0.92). Conclusion: Predictive ecological modelling is a useful complementary approach to indirectly estimating TB burden and can be considered alongside other methods in countries with limited robust empirical measurements of TB among the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.