Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30124196›Full record

SynthesisEmerging infectious diseases2018

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postexposure Prophylaxis for Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus among Healthcare Workers.

Önder Ergönül, Şiran Keske, Melis Gökçe Çeldir, İlayda Arjen Kara, Natalia Pshenichnaya, Gulzhan Abuova, Lucille Blumberg, Mehmet Gönen

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Emerging infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Therapeutic approaches for SARS-CoV-2 infection.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Önder Ergönül
Şiran Keske
Melis Gökçe Çeldir
İlayda Arjen Kara
Natalia Pshenichnaya
Gulzhan Abuova
Lucille Blumberg
Mehmet Gönen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of ribavirin use for the prevention of infection and death of healthcare workers exposed to patients with Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) infection. Splashes with blood or bodily fluids (odds ratio [OR] 4.2), being a nurse or physician (OR 2.1), and treating patients who died from CCHFV infection (OR 3.8) were associated with healthcare workers acquiring CCHFV infection; 7% of the workers who received postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) with ribavirin and 89% of those who did not became infected. PEP with ribavirin reduced the odds of infection (OR 0.01, 95% CI 0-0.03), and ribavirin use <48 hours after symptom onset reduced the odds of death (OR 0.03, 95% CI 0-0.58). The odds of death increased 2.4-fold every day without ribavirin treatment. Ribavirin should be recommended as PEP and early treatment for workers at medium-to-high risk for CCHFV infection.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelPost-Exposure ProphylaxisAntiviral AgentsGlobal HealthHemorrhagic Fever, CrimeanHemorrhagic Fever Virus, Crimean-CongoHumansRibavirinAntiviral AgentsRibavirinAlbaniaand SpainArabic EmiratesCCHFCCHFVCrimean-Congo hemorrhagic feverCrimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virusearly treatmentGermanyhealthcare workersIndiaIranKazakhstanMauritaniameta-analysisPakistanpostexposure prophylaxisPRISMAribavirinRussiaSouth AfricaSudansystematic reviewTajikistanTurkeyvector-borne infectionsviral hemorrhagic feverviruseszoonoses

Identifiers

PMID30124196
PMCPMC6106438
OpenAlexW2883032477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.