Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30123950›Full record

ReviewApplied health economics and health policy2018

SecurAcath for Securing Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance.

Tom Macmillan, Mark Pennington, Jennifer A Summers, Kate Goddard, Darshan Zala, Naomi Herz, Janet L Peacock, Stephen Keevil, Anastasia Chalkidou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied health economics and health policy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hindrances of peripherally inserted central catheter care of leukemia patients: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  6. Securing CSF catheters to the skin: from sutures and bolt system to subcutaneous anchoring device towards zero complications.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tom MacmillanKing's Technology Evaluation Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, 5th Floor, Becket House, 1 Lambeth Palace Road, London, SE1 7EU, UK. thomas.macmillan@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7274-797X
Mark PenningtonKing's Health Economics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Jennifer A SummersSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Kate GoddardKing's Technology Evaluation Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, 5th Floor, Becket House, 1 Lambeth Palace Road, London, SE1 7EU, UK.
Darshan ZalaKing's Health Economics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Naomi HerzKing's Technology Evaluation Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, 5th Floor, Becket House, 1 Lambeth Palace Road, London, SE1 7EU, UK.
Janet L PeacockSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Stephen KeevilKing's Technology Evaluation Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, 5th Floor, Becket House, 1 Lambeth Palace Road, London, SE1 7EU, UK.
Anastasia ChalkidouKing's Technology Evaluation Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, 5th Floor, Becket House, 1 Lambeth Palace Road, London, SE1 7EU, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central venous catheters are commonly used to deliver therapies and to monitor patients, and require securing at the point of percutaneous entry to avoid dislodgement. SecurAcath is a catheter securement device designed for central venous catheters. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, as a part of its Medical Technologies Evaluation Programme, selected this device for evaluation and invited the manufacturer, Interrad Medical, to submit clinical and economic evidence. The King's Technology Evaluation Centre, an External Assessment Centre commissioned by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, independently critiqued the manufacturer's submissions. The External Assessment Centre found a lack of evidence comparing SecurAcath with alternative approaches to securement (StatLock, suturing, tape securement), with one unpublished randomised controlled trial providing the strongest evidence. The External Assessment Centre conducted a new systematic review and meta-analysis and concluded that there is some evidence indicating the non-inferiority of SecurAcath compared to StatLock. The External Assessment Centre considered the manufacturer's economic model to be appropriate but made revisions to some parameters and noted significant heterogeneity in the included studies. The revised model indicated that StatLock was more cost effective than SecurAcath for catheter indwell times of up to 5 days; however, for medium- and long-term indwell times, SecurAcath was the most cost-effective option. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Medical Technologies Guidance MTG 34, issued in June 2017, recommended the adoption of SecurAcath for securing peripherally inserted central catheters within the National Health Service in England.

Indexed as

Central Venous CathetersCatheterization, Central VenousHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicTechnology Assessment, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID30123950
PMCPMC6244619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.