Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30123890›Full record

ArticleJournal of biochemistry and analytical studies2017

Factors that Affect the Osteoclastogenesis of RAW264.7 Cells.

John Nguyen, Anja Nohe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biochemistry and analytical studies, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Anti-Osteoporosis Effect ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Overview of RAW264.7 for osteoclastogensis study: Phenotype and stimuli.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John NguyenDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, USA.
Anja NoheDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, USA.

Funding

Mechanism of a mimetic peptide CK2.3 on bone formationR01AR064243 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI NOHE, ANJA G · 2013 to 2018
$1.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR064243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoclasts and their activity are key regulators of bone formation. However, studying osteoclasts is difficult. Primary osteoclast cultures are difficult to maintain and isolate. Also, the amount of cells that are isolated and their properties depend on the origin and differentiation protocols. These protocols are usually developed in a distinct lab and multiple protocols exist. A cell line to study osteoclasts and a thorough study of osteoclast differentiation and culturing is currently lacking. The RAW264.7 cell line is most commonly used to study osteoclast differentiation and its signaling pathways. RAW264.7 cells are not a homogenous cell line. They don't often exclusively differentiate into osteoclast but also into other multinucleated cells as well including macrophage polykaryons. A challenge of culturing RAW264.7 cells are culture conditions. Different conditions can affect survival, proliferation, and differentiation of RAW264.7 cells. Currently published protocols of culturing RAW264.7 cells often assume multinucleated cells that have three or more nuclei with distinguished osteoclast characteristics (such as TRAP+) as osteoclasts. However, osteoclasts and macrophage polykaryons are almost indistinguishable under a light microscope (TRAP+ with three or more nuclei). The goal of this paper is to examine the effect of culture conditions on the osteoclastogenesis ability of RAW264.7 cells. The focus will be on establishing the crucial parameters for culture density, time of stimulation, RANKL, and L-Gln concentrations. Although we are unable to establish the condition that offers a homogenous population of osteoclasts; nevertheless, we are able to identify the optimal conditions at which osteoclasts are found to be more than macrophage polykaryons. Finally, this article also demonstrates that osteoclasts and macrophage polykaryons can be distinguished by immunofluorescence staining for cathepsin K.

Indexed as

Macrophage PolykaryonsOsteoclast Culture ProtocolOsteoclastogenesisRAW264.7

Identifiers

PMID30123890
PMCPMC6097532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.