ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2018
Favorable Long-Term Outcome in Male Breast Cancer.
Article in European journal of breast health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experiences and perceptions of men following breast cancer diagnosis: a mixed method systematic review.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Male Breast Carcinoma in an Elderly Patient: A Rare Presentation and the Importance of Individualized Management.Cureus · 2026Article
- HER2 expression and pathway status in male breast cancer patients: results of an integrated analysis among 6,150 patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Male Breast Cancer: An Updated Review of Patient Characteristics, Genetics, and Outcome.International journal of breast cancer · 2024Review
- Clinical features and prognostic factors of male breast cancerTranslational cancer research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMale breast cancer (MBC) is a rare type of cancer in the breast cancer series and in the male population. Data is usually extrapolated from female breast cancer (FBC) studies. We aim to study the clinicopathological characteristics and outcome of MBC patients at our institution and we aim to emphasize the differences compared with FBC. MATERIALS AND
methodsBetween January 1993 and April 2016, 56 male patients who were diagnosed as breast cancer and underwent surgical operation were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were evaluated for demographical characteristics, surgery type, clinicopathological characteristics, adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments, follow-up time, overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), and disease specific survival (DSS).
resultsThe ratio of MBC among all breast cancers at our institution is 1%. The median age was 64 (34-85). Surgical procedures were modified radical mastectomy (MRM) in 41 patients (77%), simple mastectomy in 11 patients (21%), and lumpectomy in 1 patient (2%). Two patients were Stage 0 (4%), 7 were Stage 1 (13%), 12 were Stage 2 (22.6%), and 32 were Stage 3 (60.4%). Molecular subtypes of the invasive tumors were luminal A in 40 (80%), luminal B in 6 (12%), HER-2 type in 1 (2%), and basal-like in 3 (6%). Median follow-up time was 77 (3-287) months. 5-year and 10-year OS, DFS, and DSS rates were 80.7%, 96%, 95.6% and 71.6%, 81.9%, 91.7% respectively.
conclusionMBC presents different clinicopathological and prognostic factors when compared to FBC. Our survival rates are higher than the average presented in available literature. Because of the high rate of hormone receptor positivity, hormonal therapy is the mainstay for the treatment of estrogen receptor (ER)+ male breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.