ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2018
Immunohistochemical HER2 Status Evaluation in Breast Cancer Pathology Samples: A Multicenter, Parallel-Design Concordance Study.
Article in European journal of breast health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toward Optimizing the Impact of Digital Pathology and Augmented Intelligence on Issues of Diagnosis, Grading, Staging, and Classification.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2025Review
- Immunohistochemical assessment of HER2 low breast cancer: interobserver reproducibility and correlation with digital image analysis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- Navigating HER2-Low Testing in Invasive Breast Cancer: Update Recommendations for Pathologists.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Elevated serum HER-2 predicts poor prognosis in breast cancer and is correlated to ADAM10 expression.Cancer medicine · 2019Article
- A Root Cause Analysis Into the High Error Rate in Clinical Immunohistochemistry.Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMMArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAs patients with increased human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) overexpression are more likely to benefit from trastuzumab treatment, the accuracy of HER2 receptor status in breast cancer patients is significant for appropriate disease management. However, this assessment is not harmonized and results may be highly variable between centers. The aim of this study was to investigate the degree of interlaboratory variability in the results of HER2 expression reported by 5 participating centers and to assess the concordance between these centers and a reference laboratory.
resultsWhen the concordance of participating centers and the reference laboratory was evaluated regarding negative (0-1+), equivocal 2(+) and positive 3(+) classification of HER2 immunostaining, the highest concordance was found in Center-A, and the lowest in Center-C (Kendall's tau-b concordance coefficient 0.911 and 0.724, respectively). The concordance of the centers with reference laboratory was 80.0% both in equivocal and positive samples, while it increased up to 91.8% in negative samples.
conclusionsThis study showed that in general there is sufficiently good agreement between the reference laboratory and the participating centers for immunohistochemical HER2 assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.