Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30123878›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of breast health2018

Breast Infection: A Review of Diagnosis and Management Practices.

Eve Boakes, Amy Woods, Natalie Johnson, Naim Kadoglou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of breast health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for preventing mastitis after childbirth.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Subareolar breast abscess in males.World journal of methodology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Mammary Gland Microbiota in Benign Breast Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eve BoakesDepartment of General Surgery, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, Northwick Park Hospital, Middlesex, London.ORCID 0000-0002-5631-1495
Amy WoodsDepartment of Medicine, Croydon University Hospital, Croydon, London.ORCID 0000-0003-3282-5034
Natalie JohnsonDepartment of General Surgery, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, Northwick Park Hospital, Middlesex, London.ORCID 0000-0001-6102-8486
Naim KadoglouDepartment of General Surgery, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, Northwick Park Hospital, Middlesex, London.ORCID 0000-0002-0069-786X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mastitis is a common condition that predominates during the puerperium. Breast abscesses are less common, however when they do develop, delays in specialist referral may occur due to lack of clear protocols. In secondary care abscesses can be diagnosed by ultrasound scan and in the past the management has been dependent on the receiving surgeon. Management options include aspiration under local anesthetic or more invasive incision and drainage (I&D). Over recent years the availability of bedside/clinic based ultrasound scan has made diagnosis easier and minimally invasive procedures have become the cornerstone of breast abscess management. We review the diagnosis and management of breast infection in the primary and secondary care setting, highlighting the importance of early referral for severe infection/breast abscesses. As a clear guideline on the management of breast infection is lacking, this review provides useful guidance for those who rarely see breast infection to help avoid long-term morbidity.

Indexed as

abscessinfectionlactationMastitis

Identifiers

PMID30123878
PMCPMC6092150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.