Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30123665›Full record

ArticleMycology2018

Comparative study of genome-wide plant biomass-degrading CAZymes in white rot, brown rot and soft rot fungi.

Ayyappa Kumar Sista Kameshwar, Wensheng Qin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mycology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
20.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Isolation, Identification ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genome Sequencing and Metabolic Potential Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ayyappa Kumar Sista KameshwarDepartment of Biology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Canada.
Wensheng QinDepartment of Biology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Canada.
Lakehead University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have conducted a genome-level comparative study of basidiomycetes wood-rotting fungi (white, brown and soft rot) to understand the total plant biomass (lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose and pectin) -degrading abilities. We have retrieved the genome-level annotations of well-known 14 white rot fungi, 15 brown rot fungi and 13 soft rot fungi. Based on the previous literature and the annotations obtained from CAZy (carbohydrate-active enzyme) database, we have separated the genome-wide CAZymes of the selected fungi into lignin-, cellulose-, hemicellulose- and pectin-degrading enzymes. Results obtained in our study reveal that white rot fungi, especially

Indexed as

brown rot fungiCAZylignocellulosePlant biomasssoft rot fungiwhite rot fungi

Identifiers

PMID30123665
PMCPMC6059041
OpenAlexW2778440130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.