Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30123585›Full record

ArticleCritical care research and practice2018

Improved Outcomes following the Establishment of a Neurocritical Care Unit in Saudi Arabia.

Ibrahim Soliman, Waleed Tharwat Aletreby, Fahad Faqihi, Nasir Nasim Mahmood, Omar E Ramadan, Ahmad Fouad Mady, Babar Kahlon, Abdulrahman Alharthy, Peter Brindley, Dimitrios Karakitsos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care research and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluating complications in a South African neurocritical care unit: A 1-year retrospective audit.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ibrahim SolimanNeurocritical Care Unit, Critical Care Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0290-5044
Waleed Tharwat AletrebyNeurocritical Care Unit, Critical Care Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8387-1829
Fahad FaqihiNeurocritical Care Unit, Critical Care Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nasir Nasim MahmoodNeurocritical Care Unit, Critical Care Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Omar E RamadanNeurocritical Care Unit, Critical Care Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad Fouad MadyNeurocritical Care Unit, Critical Care Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Babar KahlonDepartment of Neurosurgery, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman AlharthyNeurocritical Care Unit, Critical Care Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Peter BrindleyCritical Care Department, University of Alberta, Canada.
Dimitrios KarakitsosNeurocritical Care Unit, Critical Care Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-3370-7099

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDedicated neurocritical care units have dramatically improved the management and outcome following brain injury worldwide.

aimThis is the first study in the Middle East to evaluate the clinical impact of a neurocritical care unit (NCCU) launched within the diverse clinical setting of a polyvalent intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN AND

methodsA retrospective before and after cohort study comparing the outcomes of neurologically injured patients. Group one met criteria for NCCU admission but were admitted to the general ICU as the NCCU was not yet operational (group 1). Group two were subsequently admitted thereafter to the NCCU once it had opened (group 2). The primary outcome was all-cause ICU and hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were ICU length of stay (LOS), predictors of ICU and hospital discharge, ICU discharge Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), frequency of tracheostomies, ICP monitoring, and operative interventions.

resultsAdmission to NCCU was a significant predictor of increased hospital discharge with an odds ratio of 2.3 (95% CI: 1.3-4.1;

conclusionAdmission to NCCU, within a polyvalent Middle Eastern ICU, was associated with significantly decreased mortality and increased hospital discharge.

Identifiers

PMID30123585
PMCPMC6079555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.