Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30123432›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

Screening for distress in patients with intracranial tumors during the first 6 months after diagnosis using self-reporting instruments and an expert rating scale (the basic documentation for psycho-oncology short form - PO-Bado SF).

Mirjam Renovanz, Helena Tsakmaklis, Sari Soebianto, Isabell Neppel, Minou Nadji-Ohl, Manfred Beutel, Andreas Werner, Florian Ringel, Anne-Katrin Hickmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frequency of social burden and underage children in neuro-oncological patients.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mirjam RenovanzDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Helena TsakmaklisDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Sari SoebiantoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Isabell NeppelDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Minou Nadji-OhlDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Stuttgart, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
Manfred BeutelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Andreas WernerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Florian RingelDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Anne-Katrin HickmannDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Stuttgart, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePsychosocial screening in brain tumor patients is of high importance. We applied The Basic Documentation for Psycho-Oncology Short Form (PO-Bado SF) in primary brain tumor patients and patients with metastasis. The aim was to evaluating consistency between physicians' perception and the results of the patients' self-assessment. MATERIALS AND

methods140 patients with first diagnosis of a brain tumor were screened during their hospital stay (t1) using Distress Thermometer (DT) and Hornheide Screening Instrument (HSI), health-related quality of life was assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 + BN20. After 3 (t2) and 6 months (t3), patients were re-evaluated. Attending neuro-oncologists completed the PO-Bado SF at all three time points (cut-off for being in need for support >8).

resultsAt t1, the mean of the PO-Bado SF total score was 7.71 (SD = 4.08), at t2 8.22 (SD = 5.40) and at t3 7.62 (SD = 5.72).The proportion of patients reaching a total score >8 was at t1: 43%, at t2: 41% and at t3: 47% (t1-3). Discrimination of PO-Bado SF total score, between patients in (DT ≥6) and those not in distress was more sensitive (cut-off 8.5, AUC 0.772, sens. 71.3%, spec. 67.6%) than discrimination compared to the HIS (cut-off 9.5, AUC 0.779, sens. 65.1%, spec. 77.7%). Higher PO-Bado-SF total score correlated with higher DT scores (

conclusionPhysicians' perception according to PO-Bado SF provides a different measure for psychosocial burden in patients with brain tumors, however does not completely reflect patients' wishes.

Indexed as

brain tumor patientsexternal assessmentneuro-oncologyPo-BADOpsychosocial screening

Identifiers

PMID30123432
PMCPMC6089557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.