ReviewThe Pan African medical journal2018
[Genital metastases from breast cancer: study of 3 cases and literature review].
Review in The Pan African medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women. Prognosis depends, in large part, on the presence of metastases. Liver, skeleton and lungs are the most frequent metastatic sites, whereas genital metastases are more rare and less known. The detection of an ovarian mass in a woman with a history of breast cancer raises the question of its primary or secondary origin. The frequency of ovarian metastases reported in the literature is approximately 20-30%. However, when an ovarian mass is detected in a woman with breast cancer, primary ovarian tumor is diagnosed three times more often than a metastasis. Cervical, uterine or corporeal metastases are even more rare. They are often diagnosed late, due to their clinical latency; transvaginal ultrasound coupled with Color Doppler and Pap smear must be performed as first-line examinations knowing that their screening performance in patients with ovarian masses is deemed low. An increase in CA 15-3 and CEA tumor markers must lead clinicians to investigate for metastases, but it doesn't provide diagnostic orientation toward a specific metastatic site. Finally, only anatomo-athological examination allows certain diagnosis. We here report 3 cases of genital metastases from primary breast cancer (two patients with ovarian metastases and one patient with cervico-uterine metastasis) in order to highlight the role of accurate and regular genital examination in the monitoring of patients with breast cancer and to discuss the predictive factors for their occurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.