ReviewWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2018
2017 WSES guidelines on colon and rectal cancer emergencies: obstruction and perforation.
Review in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06338332 (Obstructive Colon Cancer, a Bridge to Surgery in Right Sided Obstructive Colon Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 161 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Obstructive Colon Cancer, a Bridge to Surgery in Right Sided Obstructive Colon Cancer
Who cites it
161 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 372 citations in OpenAlex.
- Initial management strategies for right-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Self-expanding metal stents versus decompression tubes as a bridge to surgery for patients with obstruction caused by colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2023Pooled it
- Self-expandable metallic stent as bridge to surgery vs. emergency resection in obstructive right-sided colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Management of left-sided malignant colorectal obstructions with curative intent: a network meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Pooled it
- A Systematic Review Comparing Emergency Resection and Staged Treatment for Curable Obstructing Right-Sided Colon Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2021Pooled it
- The management of surgical patients in the emergency setting during COVID-19 pandemic: the WSES position paper.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2021Guideline
- Current Status of the Self-Expandable Metal Stent as a Bridge to Surgery Versus Emergency Surgery in Colorectal Cancer: Results from an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Pooled it
- Enhanced recovery after surgery in emergency resection for obstructive colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020Pooled it
- Long-term outcomes of stent-related perforation in malignant colon obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020Pooled it
- Comparison of different types of covered self-expandable metal stents for malignant colorectal obstruction.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Trial
- An unusual colo-ovarian fistula of advanced colorectal carcinoma: A case report and literature review.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Minimally invasive versus open emergency right-sided colectomy for malignant obstruction: a nationwide propensity score-matched cohort study.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a bridge to surgery versus direct surgery following SEMS placement in obstructive left-sided colon cancer: a multicenter prospective cohort study.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Article
- Colonic resection or self-expanding metal stents for obstructive left colon cancer: results of a national multicenter prospective cohort study (CROSCO-1).Surgical endoscopy · 2026Observational
- Bridge-to-surgery in acute right-sided obstructing colon cancer: A survey of surgeons' perspectives on treatment strategies.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026Article
- A nomogram for predicting 3-month mortality in colorectal cancer patients requiring perioperative ICU admission: a retrospective cohort study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- A quasi-bridge to surgery approach for stage IV obstructive colon cancer: extending the bridge-to-surgery concept to metastatic disease.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Short-term outcomes of bridge-to-surgery using self-expanding metallic stents in robotic colorectal surgery for obstructive left-sided colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Clinical spotlight review: best practices for the management of colorectal cancer in the emergency and acute care setting.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Review
101 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
51 authors at 20 institutions in 14 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ᅟ: Obstruction and perforation due to colorectal cancer represent challenging matters in terms of diagnosis, life-saving strategies, obstruction resolution and oncologic challenge. The aims of the current paper are to update the previous WSES guidelines for the management of large bowel perforation and obstructive left colon carcinoma (OLCC) and to develop new guidelines on obstructive right colon carcinoma (ORCC). Methods: The literature was extensively queried for focused publication until December 2017. Precise analysis and grading of the literature has been performed by a working group formed by a pool of experts: the statements and literature review were presented, discussed and voted at the Consensus Conference of the 4th Congress of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) held in Campinas in May 2017. Results: CT scan is the best imaging technique to evaluate large bowel obstruction and perforation. For OLCC, self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS), when available, offers interesting advantages as compared to emergency surgery; however, the positioning of SEMS for surgically treatable causes carries some long-term oncologic disadvantages, which are still under analysis. In the context of emergency surgery, resection and primary anastomosis (RPA) is preferable to Hartmann's procedure, whenever the characteristics of the patient and the surgeon are permissive. Right-sided loop colostomy is preferable in rectal cancer, when preoperative therapies are predicted.With regards to the treatment of ORCC, right colectomy represents the procedure of choice; alternatives, such as internal bypass and loop ileostomy, are of limited value.Clinical scenarios in the case of perforation might be dramatic, especially in case of free faecal peritonitis. The importance of an appropriate balance between life-saving surgical procedures and respect of oncologic caveats must be stressed. In selected cases, a damage control approach may be required.Medical treatments including appropriate fluid resuscitation, early antibiotic treatment and management of co-existing medical conditions according to international guidelines must be delivered to all patients at presentation. Conclusions: The current guidelines offer an extensive overview of available evidence and a qualitative consensus regarding management of large bowel obstruction and perforation due to colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.