Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30123143›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2018

Machine Learning Based Classification of Deep Brain Stimulation Outcomes in a Rat Model of Binge Eating Using Ventral Striatal Oscillations.

Wilder T Doucette, Lucas Dwiel, Jared E Boyce, Amanda A Simon, Jibran Y Khokhar, Alan I Green

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Wilder T DoucetteDepartment of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, United States.
Lucas DwielDepartment of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, United States.
Jared E BoyceDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Hanover, NH, United States.
Amanda A SimonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Hanover, NH, United States.
Jibran Y KhokharDepartment of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, United States.
Alan I GreenDepartment of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, United States.
Dartmouth College · USUniversity of Guelph · CA

Funding

SYNERGY: The Dartmouth Center for clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001086 · NCATS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI GREEN, ALAN I · 2013 to 2017
$18.3M
SYNERGY: The Dartmouth Center for clinical and Translational ScienceKL2TR001088 · NCATS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI GREEN, ALAN I · 2013 to 2017
$3.3M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001088NCATS NIH HHS L30 TR001245NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001086NIDDK NIH HHS L30 DK096655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromodulation-based interventions continue to be evaluated across an array of appetitive disorders but broader implementation of these approaches remains limited due to variable treatment outcomes. We hypothesize that individual variation in treatment outcomes may be linked to differences in the networks underlying these disorders. Here, Sprague-Dawley rats received deep brain stimulation separately within each nucleus accumbens (NAc) sub-region (core and shell) using a within-animal crossover design in a rat model of binge eating. Significant reductions in binge size were observed with stimulation of either target but with significant variation in effectiveness across individuals. When features of local field potentials (LFPs) recorded from the NAc were used to classify the pre-defined stimulation outcomes (response or non-response) from each rat using a machine-learning approach (lasso), stimulation outcomes could be classified with greater accuracy than expected by chance (effect sizes: core = 1.13, shell = 1.05). Further, these LFP features could be used to identify the best stimulation target for each animal (core vs. shell) with an effect size = 0.96. These data suggest that individual differences in underlying network activity may relate to the variable outcomes of circuit based interventions, and measures of network activity could have the potential to individually guide the selection of an optimal stimulation target to improve overall treatment response rates.

Indexed as

binge eatingdeep brain stimulation (DBS)local field potential (LFP)machine learning applied to neurosciencenucleus accumbens

Identifiers

PMID30123143
PMCPMC6085408
OpenAlexW2952316777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.