ArticleClinical epidemiology2018
Intracerebral hemorrhage: positive predictive value of diagnosis codes in two nationwide Danish registries.
Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification and characterization of intracerebral hemorrhage events in elderly veterans with alzheimer's disease in the veterans affairs healthcare system.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Stroke severity and other predictors of venous thromboembolism in stroke patients-a population-based cohort study.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- Feasibility of Identifying Acute Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage Events Using Diagnostic Coding Among Veterans with Mild Cognitive Impairment or Alzheimer's Dementia.Neurology and therapy · 2025Article
- Association of Antithrombotic Drug Use With Incident Intracerebral Hemorrhage Location.Neurology · 2024Article
- Mental Health Conditions in Partners and Adult Children of Stroke Survivors.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Cardiovascular Data Quality in the Danish National Patient Registry (1977-2024): A Systematic Review.Clinical epidemiology · 2024Review
- Association of Statin Use With Risk of Stroke Recurrence After Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Neurology · 2023Article
- Major Cardiovascular Events After Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage by Hematoma Location.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Association Between Statin Use and Intracerebral Hemorrhage Location: A Nested Case-Control Registry Study.Neurology · 2023Article
- Labour market participation and retirement after stroke in Denmark: registry based cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023Article
- Positive Predictive Value of Non-Traumatic Bleeding Diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Register.Clinical epidemiology · 2023Article
- Intracranial Hemorrhage Following Anticoagulant Treatment in Denmark: Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Reports Versus Real-World Data.Drug safety · 2022Observational
- Sex-Differences in Oral Anticoagulant-Related Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Effectiveness and Safety of NOAC Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Aortic Stenosis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Observational
- Article
- Incidence and Outcomes of Hemorrhagic Stroke among Adults in Spain (2016-2018) According to Sex: A Retrospective, Cohort, Observational, Propensity Score Matched Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Vegetable nitrate intake, blood pressure and incident cardiovascular disease: Danish Diet, Cancer, and Health Study.European journal of epidemiology · 2021Article
- Sex-related disparities in the incidence and outcomes of hemorrhagic stroke among type 2 diabetes patients: a propensity score matching analysis using the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database for the period 2016-18.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2021Observational
- Trends in incidence of oral anticoagulant-related intracerebral hemorrhage and sales of oral anticoagulants in Capital Region of Denmark 2010-2017.European stroke journal · 2021Article
- Validation of ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Codes for Identification of Patients with Acute Hemorrhagic Stroke in a National Health Insurance Claims Database.Clinical epidemiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study is to establish the validity of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) diagnoses in the Danish Stroke Registry (DSR) and the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR). PATIENTS AND
methodsWe estimated the positive predictive value (PPV) of ICH diagnoses for a sample of 500 patients from the DSR (patients recorded under ICH diagnosis) and DNPR (International Classification of Diseases, version 10, code I61) during 2010-2015, using discharge summaries and brain imaging reports (minimal data). We estimated PPVs for any ICH (a-ICH) and spontaneous ICH (s-ICH) alone. Furthermore, we assessed PPVs according to whether patients were recorded in both or only one of the registries. Finally, in a subsample with ICH diagnoses with access to full medical records and original imaging studies (extensive data, n=100), we compared s-ICH diagnosis and hemorrhage location after use of extensive vs minimal data.
resultsIn the DSR, the PPVs were 94% (95% CI, 91%-96%) for a-ICH and 85% (95% CI, 81%-88%) for s-ICH. In the DNPR, the PPVs were 88% (95% CI, 84%-91%) for a-ICH and 75% (95% CI, 70%-79%) for s-ICH. PPVs for s-ICH for patients recorded in both registries, DSR only, and DNPR only were 86% (95% CI, 82-99), 80% (95%CI, 71-87), and 49% (95%CI, 39-59), respectively. Evaluation of extensive vs minimal data verified s-ICH diagnosis in 98% and hemorrhage location in 94%.
conclusionThe validity of a-ICH diagnoses in DSR and DNPR is sufficiently high to support their use in epidemiologic studies. For s-ICH, validity was high in DSR. In DNPR, s-ICH validity was lower, markedly so for the small subgroup of patients only recorded in this registry. Minimal data including discharge summaries and brain imaging reports were feasible and valid for identifying ICH location.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.