ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry : JCD
Comparison of anti-
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of antibacterial efficacy ofBioMedicine · 2023Article
- Antimicrobial, antioxidant and antileishmanial activities of Ziziphus lotus leaves.Archives of microbiology · 2022Article
- Ethnopharmacology, Biological Evaluation, and Chemical Composition ofAdvances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2022Review
- In vitro antidermatophytic activity of bioactive compounds from selected medicinal plants.Journal of analytical science and technology · 2021Article
- Comparison of the fungicidal efficacy of photodynamic therapy with methylene blue, silver nanoparticle, and their conjugation on oralCurrent medical mycology · 2020Article
- Evaluation of the antifungal activity ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2020Article
- Antifungal effect of the bark and root extracts ofCurrent medical mycology · 2018Article
- The effects ofClinical pathology (Thousand Oaks, Ventura County, Calif.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextMedicinal plants have reportedly fewer side effects, compared to antifungal agents.
aimsThis study was designed to compare the anti- SUBJECTS AND
methodsAnti-
resultsThe minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) 90 values for
conclusionUnripe fruits of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.