Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30122802›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2018

Deep learning for biomarker regression: application to osteoporosis and emphysema on chest CT scans.

Germán González, George R Washko, Raúl San José Estépar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Predict the Airway Disorders Illness: A Systematic Review.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Applications of Machine Learning in Bone and Mineral Research.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Deep learning in systems medicine.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Biomarker Localization From Deep Learning Regression Networks.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. LOCALIZING IMAGE-BASED BIOMARKER REGRESSION WITHOUT TRAINING MASKS: A NEW APPROACH TO BIOMARKER DISCOVERY.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Germán GonzálezSierra Research S.L. Avda Costa Blanca 132. Alicante. Spain.
George R WashkoDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine. Department of Medicine. Brigham and Women's Hospital. 75 Francis St, Boston, MA. USA.
Raúl San José EstéparApplied Chest Imaging Laboratory. Department of Radiology. Brigham and Women's Hospital. 1249 Boylston St, Boston MA, 02115.

Funding

The clinical impact of pulmonary vascular remodeling in smokersR01HL116473 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SAN JOSE ESTEPAR, RAUL, WASHKO, GEORGE R · 2013 to 2021
$5.0M
Airway Inspector: a chest imaging biomarker software platform for COPDR01HL116931 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SAN JOSE ESTEPAR, RAUL · 2013 to 2017
$2.2M
CT-based Predictors of ILA Progression in COPDGeneR21HL140422 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SAN JOSE ESTEPAR, RAUL · 2017 to 2018
$264k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL116473NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL116931NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL140422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBiomarker computation using deep-learning often relies on a two-step process, where the deep learning algorithm segments the region of interest and then the biomarker is measured. We propose an alternative paradigm, where the biomarker is estimated directly using a regression network. We showcase this image-to-biomarker paradigm using two biomarkers: the estimation of bone mineral density (BMD) and the estimation of lung percentage of emphysema from CT scans. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe use a large database of 9,925 CT scans to train, validate and test the network for which reference standard BMD and percentage emphysema have been already computed. First, the 3D dataset is reduced to a set of canonical 2D slices where the organ of interest is visible (either spine for BMD or lungs for emphysema). This data reduction is performed using an automatic object detector. Second, The regression neural network is composed of three convolutional layers, followed by a fully connected and an output layer. The network is optimized using a momentum optimizer with an exponential decay rate, using the root mean squared error as cost function.

resultsThe Pearson correlation coefficients obtained against the reference standards are

conclusionsThe deep-learning regression architecture can learn biomarkers from images directly, without indicating the structures of interest. This approach simplifies the development of biomarker extraction algorithms. The proposed data reduction based on object detectors conveys enough information to compute the biomarkers of interest.

Indexed as

bone mineral densitycomputed tomographydeep learningemphysemaregression

Identifiers

PMID30122802
PMCPMC6097534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.