ReviewIndian heart journal2018
Sacubitril/valsartan: A novel angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor.
Review in Indian heart journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety profile of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors in the management of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Heart failure reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Blood pressure lowering efficacy of sacubitril/allisartan versus olmesartan in elderly Chinese hypertensive patients.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2026Article
- Oxidative Stress in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: Molecular Mechanisms, Current Treatment and Therapeutic Potential of Plant Antioxidants.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Sacubitril/Valsartan Fails to Ameliorate Cisplatin-Induced Cognitive Impairment.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- Quantitative Evaluation of Cardiac Function Improvement by Conventional Cardiology Drug Regimens Combined with Sacubitril/Valsartan Sodium in Heart Failure Patients.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Sacubitril/valsartan ameliorates cardiac function and ventricular remodeling in CHF rats via the inhibition of the tryptophan/kynurenine metabolism and inflammation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Cost-utility analysis of valsartan, enalapril, and candesartan in patients with heart failure in Iran.Health economics review · 2023Article
- Effects of neprilysin and neprilysin inhibitors on glucose homeostasis: Controversial points and a promising arena.Journal of diabetes · 2023Review
- Exploring the Complex Relationship between Diabetes and Cardiovascular Complications: Understanding Diabetic Cardiomyopathy and Promising Therapies.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Sacubitril/valsartan in Heart Failure and Beyond-From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Relevance.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Assessing clinical and biomarker characteristics to optimize the benefits of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Biomarkers of Volume Overload and Edema in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Sacubitril/valsartan versus angiotensin inhibitors and arrhythmia endpoints in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.Heart rhythm O2 · 2021Article
- COVID-19, cytokines, inflammation, and spices: How are they related?Life sciences · 2021Review
- ECG Monitoring of Reactions to Sacubitril-valsartan in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020Article
- Beneficial effects of one-month sacubitril/valsartan treatment in a patient affected by end-stage dystrophinopathic cardiomyopathy.Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2020Article
- Sacubitril/valsartan in HFrEF - Should the aces up our sleeves be played earlier?International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2019Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the efficacy, superiority and safety profile of the first-in-class angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor "Sacubitril/Valsartan" as compared to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) in heart failure (HF) patients, reviewing data available from both clinical and pre-clinical studies. Evidences on health care utilization outcomes such as hospitalizations and emergency department visits were also evaluated. MATERIAL (DATA SOURCE): Sources: Medical literature on 'Sacubitril/Valsartan' and 'Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor' was identified by searching databases (including, but not limited to, PubMed, Embase and HighWire) for articles published since 1991, bibliographies from published literature, clinical trial registries/databases and websites (including those of regional regulatory agencies and the manufacturer). Additional information (including contributory unpublished data) was also requested from the companies developing the drug. SEARCH STRATEGY: We conducted separate searches for each of the interventions of interest. The timeframe for both searches spanned the period from January 1991 to the most recently published data available and focused on PubMed, Embase and HighWire indexed articles. The search strategies included a combination of indexing terms as well as free-text terms included separately in 'Keywords' section. To supplement the above searches and ensure optimal and complete literature retrieval, we performed a manual check of the references of recent relevant reviews and meta-analysis. Searches were last updated on 12th July 2017. SELECTION: Studies in patients with hypertension who received sacubitril/valsartan combination drug were included. Inclusion of studies was based mainly on the methods section of the trials. When available, large, well-controlled trials with appropriate statistical methodology was preferred. Relevant pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics data was also included. DATA EVALUATION: Many clinical trials have been conducted comparing the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan with other anti-hypertensives. The trials have shown sacubitril/valsartan to be more effective in improving symptoms and physical limitations, reducing the risk of cardiovascular (CV) death, HF hospitalization, and the overall mortality and morbidity compared to its counterparts.
conclusionEffective reduction of blood pressure to accepted goals is the key to reduce the risk of CV events and stroke. Dual inhibition of neprilysin and the angiotensin receptor with sacubitril/valsartan may represent an attractive and serendipitous therapeutic approach for a range of CV diseases, including hypertension and HF, in which vasoconstriction, volume overload and neuro-hormonal activation play a part in pathophysiology. Sacubitril/Valsartan appears to be more efficacious in reducing blood pressure than currently available ACEi and ARBs with a similar safety and tolerability profile. Besides, pleiotropic benefits like HbA
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.