Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30121958›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2019

Alternative splicing expands the prognostic impact of KRAS in microsatellite stable primary colorectal cancer.

Ina A Eilertsen, Anita Sveen, Jonas M Strømme, Rolf I Skotheim, Arild Nesbakken, Ragnhild A Lothe

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The role of alternative splicing in lung cancer.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2023
    Review
  7. Differential functions of the KRAS splice variants.Biochemical Society transactions · 2023
    Review
  8. Alternative RNA splicing defects in pediatric cancers: new insights in tumorigenesis and potential therapeutic vulnerabilities.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. The role of KRAS splice variants in cancer biology.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Development of alternative splicing signature in lung squamous cell carcinoma.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ina A EilertsenDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4196-4642
Anita SveenDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Jonas M StrømmeDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Rolf I SkotheimDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Arild NesbakkenK.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Center, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ragnhild A LotheDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

KRAS mutation is a well-known marker for poor response to targeted treatment and patient prognosis in microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC). However, variation in clinical outcomes among patients wild-type for KRAS underlines that this is not a homogeneous population. Here, we evaluated the prognostic impact of KRAS alternative splicing in relation to mutation status in a single-hospital series of primary MSS CRCs (N = 258). Using splicing-sensitive microarrays and RNA sequencing, the relative expression of KRAS-4A versus KRAS-4B transcript variants was confirmed to be down-regulated in CRC compared to normal colonic mucosa (N = 41; p ≤ 0.001). This was independent of mutation status, however, gene set enrichment analysis revealed that the effect of splicing on KRAS signaling was specific to the KRAS wild-type subgroup, in which low relative KRAS-4A expression was associated with a higher level of KRAS signaling (p = 0.005). In concordance, the prognostic value of KRAS splicing was also dependent on mutation status, and for patients with Stage I-III KRAS wild-type MSS CRC, low relative KRAS-4A expression was associated with inferior overall survival (HR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.07-5.18, p = 0.033), a result not found in mutant cases (p

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingMicrosatellite InstabilityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)KRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)alternative splicingcolorectal cancerKRASmicrosatellite stableprognosis

Identifiers

PMID30121958
PMCPMC6587976
OpenAlexW2886318879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.