Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30121883›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2018

Heart rate and pulmonary oxygen uptake response in professional badminton players: comparison between on-court game simulation and laboratory exercise testing.

Susanna Rampichini, Eloisa Limonta, Lorenzo Pugliese, Emiliano Cè, Angela V Bisconti, Antonio Gianfelici, Antonio La Torre, Fabio Esposito

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susanna RampichiniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via G. Colombo 71, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Eloisa LimontaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via G. Colombo 71, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Lorenzo PuglieseFederazione Italiana Badminton, CONI, Rome, Italy.
Emiliano CèDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via G. Colombo 71, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Angela V BiscontiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via G. Colombo 71, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Antonio GianfeliciFederazione Italiana Badminton, CONI, Rome, Italy.
Antonio La TorreDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via G. Colombo 71, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Fabio EspositoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via G. Colombo 71, 20133, Milan, Italy. fabio.esposito@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4420-2611
University of Milan · ITAssociazione Italiana Arbitri · IT

Funding

Badminton World Federation UNIAGI 18575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBadminton is characterized by bouts of high intensity interspersed by short recovery periods. Aerobic assessment via indirect calorimetry is impractical on court because of the encumbrance of portable metabolic devices. When the relationship between heart rate (HR) and pulmonary oxygen uptake [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] is linear, HR monitoring can provide an indirect estimation of metabolic demands on court. However, owing to the intermittent nature of badminton, the [Formula: see text] relationship will differ from that obtained in the laboratory, making its use on court questionable. The aims of this study were to (i) assess cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses during on-court badminton rally simulations at different intensities and (ii) compare [Formula: see text] relationships obtained from laboratory and on-court measurements.

methodsThe study sample was seven professional badminton players (age 16.9 ± 2.1 years; body mass 62.8 ± 9.2 kg; stature 1.71 ± 0.09 m). [Formula: see text] HR, and other respiratory and metabolic parameters were assessed in the laboratory with an incremental intermittent Astrand-type test (IIAT) and on court during rally simulations at three different intensities.

resultsCardiorespiratory parameters measured during the rallies reached 95% of maximal IIAT values. The [Formula: see text] slope and intercept differed in the on-court and the IIAT conditions (P = 0.012 and P = 0.008, respectively).

conclusionsThe difference in [Formula: see text] regression lines between the IIAT and the on-court condition indicates that HR monitoring may not provide accurate data on the aerobic demands of specific on-court badminton tasks. HR monitoring should be preceded by an indirect calorimetry test on court to assess aerobic demands more precisely.

Indexed as

AdolescentExerciseExercise TestFemaleHeart RateHumansLungMaleOxygen ConsumptionRacquet SportsYoung AdultAssessmentMeasurementPerformancePhysiological profileRacket sports

Identifiers

PMID30121883
OpenAlexW2886099567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.