ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2018
Presence of anaerobic bacteria in the urinary tract of catheterized ICU patients.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Gram-Negative Bacteria in Urinary Tract Infections: Current Concepts and Therapeutic Options.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Review
- Sonication as a tool for disrupting biofilms and recovering microorganisms in bladder catheters.Jornal brasileiro de nefrologiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of our study was to examine the extent of anaerobic bacteriuria in catheterized patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and to search for risk factors for anaerobic bacteriuria. A urine culture was collected from each patient every 2 days during their ICU stay and incubated under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Aerobic and anaerobic blood cultures were collected as well. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected from patient files. Ninety patients were included in this study, 32 women (35.6%) and 58 men (64.4%). A total of 663 cultures were obtained. Twenty-three patients (25.6%) had growth of anaerobic bacteria in a urinary culture at some point during ICU stay, with Bifidobacterium being the most common pathogen. Aerobic urinary cultures were positive in 38 patients (42.2%). A significant statistical correlation was found between the presence of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in urine culture (p = 0.0004). Treatment with glycopeptides was found to be inversely associated with anaerobic bacteriuria (p = 0.0292), and treatment with imidazoles was associated with an increased risk of anaerobic bacteriuria (p = 0.0186). None of the patients developed bacteremia with the same anaerobic pathogen that was isolated from their urine. Anaerobic bacteriuria is a common phenomenon in catheterized patients in the ICU. Further studies are needed in order to define the clinical significance of these findings in such patients and in other patient groups as well as in healthy people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.