Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30121802›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2019

Therapeutic efficacy of rituximab for the management of adult-onset steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome: a retrospective study.

Takayuki Katsuno, Tomohiro Masuda, Shoji Saito, Noritoshi Kato, Takuji Ishimoto, Sawako Kato, Tomoki Kosugi, Naotake Tsuboi, Hiroshi Kitamura, Toyonori Tsuzuki and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Takayuki KatsunoDepartment of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Karimata, Yazako, Nagakute, 480-1195, Japan. t-katsuno@aichi-med-u.ac.jp.
Tomohiro MasudaDepartment of Nephrology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Shoji SaitoDepartment of Nephrology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Noritoshi KatoDepartment of Nephrology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Takuji IshimotoDepartment of Nephrology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Sawako KatoDepartment of Nephrology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Tomoki KosugiDepartment of Nephrology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Naotake TsuboiDepartment of Nephrology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Hiroshi KitamuraDepartment of Pathology, National Hospital Organization Chiba East Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Toyonori TsuzukiDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan.
Yasuhiko ItoDepartment of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Karimata, Yazako, Nagakute, 480-1195, Japan.
Shoichi MaruyamaDepartment of Nephrology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Nagoya University · JPAichi Medical University · JPChiba East Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent reports have described the efficacy of rituximab in treating steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) in pediatric patients. However, few reports describe data regarding adult-onset SDNS. We investigated the efficacy of rituximab for the management of adult-onset SDNS.

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study investigating eight patients with adult-onset SDNS who were treated with rituximab. Clinical data were obtained at the initiation of rituximab therapy. The primary outcomes evaluated were successful suppression of relapses and CD19+ cells after rituximab treatment. The corticosteroid- and immunosuppressant-sparing effect and adverse events were additionally evaluated.

resultsAll eight patients were diagnosed with minimal change nephrotic syndrome and received immunosuppressants in addition to corticosteroid. Total number of relapses was 10.5 times as a median value. Rituximab administration was repeated in two patients, whereas six received single-dose rituximab. Three of eight (37.5%) patients showed relapse after rituximab therapy. A rituximab-induced depletion in CD19+ cells noted initially was followed by their reappearance in all patients. There were cases with no relapse after the reappearance of CD19+ cells. The median relapse time pre- and post-rituximab therapy showed a decrease from 1 time/year (interquartile range [IQR] 1-3 times/year) to 0 time/year (IQR 0-1 time/year). Rituximab treatment induced a significant reduction in the required doses of corticosteroid and cyclosporine (P < 0.01). No serious adverse events were observed.

conclusionRituximab treatment was effective not only in childhood-onset but also in adult-onset SDNS. Further studies are needed to establish optimal treatment regimens.

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex HormonesAdultAge of OnsetFemaleHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedNephrosis, LipoidRecurrenceRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesRituximabTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAdrenal Cortex HormonesImmunologic FactorsImmunosuppressive AgentsRituximabAdult-onsetFrequently relapsing nephrotic syndromeMinimal change nephrotic syndromeRituximabSteroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome

Identifiers

PMID30121802
OpenAlexW2887596833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.