Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30121790›Full record

ArticleJournal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs2019

Interhospital transport of ARDS patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Jan Florian Heuer, Moritz Mirschel, Annalen Bleckmann, Michael Quintel, Onnen Moerer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jan Florian HeuerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Pain Management, Augusta-Kliniken Bochum-Mitte, Bochum, Germany. j.heuer@augusta-bochum.de.
Moritz MirschelDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Pain Management, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Annalen BleckmannDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Michael QuintelDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Pain Management, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Onnen MoererDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Pain Management, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEAugusta-Kranken-Anstalt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be a lifesaving therapy for patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ECMO is a technically complex and challenging procedure and should therefore only be performed in specialized centers. Transporting ARDS patients to ECMO centers for treatment can be dangerous because of the risk of hypoxemia during transport. This raises the question if ECMO should not be already initiated in the transferring hospital before transport. Over a 5-year period, we studied ARDS patients who had been transported to our department by our mobile ECMO team for further treatment after ECMO had already been initiated at the referring hospital. Data for analysis were obtained from our patient data management system (PDMS), the referral documents, and from the referring hospitals. Seventy-five patients meeting the selection criteria were studied. All had been successfully cannulated in the transferring hospitals. They were transported to our ECMO center by helicopter (n = 34) or mobile intensive care units (n = 41). No patient died during transport. Forty four of the patients were transported at night. Twenty-six patients (35%) died in our intensive care unit due to a therapy refractory course, comorbidities or limitation of therapy. Patients on ECMO therapy can be safely transferred to a specialist center. Setting up ECMO in an unfamiliar location and the subsequent patient transport can be very challenging and should only be performed by a highly trained, experienced team.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationIntensive Care UnitsAdultFemaleGermanyHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeRetrospective StudiesTransportation of PatientsECMOHelicopterMobile intensive care unitsOutcomeTransferring hospitals

Identifiers

PMID30121790
OpenAlexW2886868483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.