Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30121697›Full record

Trial reportClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2019

Bromocriptine treatment in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy and right ventricular dysfunction.

Arash Haghikia, Johannes Schwab, Jens Vogel-Claussen, Dominik Berliner, Tobias Pfeffer, Tobias König, Carolin Zwadlo, Valeska Abou Moulig, Annegret Franke, Marziel Schwarzkopf and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. What Do We Know about Peripartum Cardiomyopathy? Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Peripartum cardiomyopathy.Heart failure reviews · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Cardiomyopathy and pregnancy.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2019
    Review
  17. Role of pregnancy hormones and hormonal interaction on the maternal cardiovascular system: a literature review.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Arash HaghikiaDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Johannes SchwabUniversitätsklinik für Innere Medizin 8-Schwerpunkt Kardiologie und Institut für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Klinikum Nürnberg Süd, Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität Nürnberg, Breslauer Str. 201, 90471, Nuremberg, Germany.
Jens Vogel-ClaussenInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Dominik BerlinerDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Tobias PfefferDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Tobias KönigDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Carolin ZwadloDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Valeska Abou MouligDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Annegret FrankeFaculty of Medicine, University Leipzig, Clinical Trial Centre (KKS), ZKS Leipzig, Haertelstr. 16-18, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Marziel SchwarzkopfFaculty of Medicine, University Leipzig, Clinical Trial Centre (KKS), ZKS Leipzig, Haertelstr. 16-18, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Philipp EhlermannDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, and Pneumology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Roman PfisterDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Guido MichelsDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Ralf WestenfeldDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Verena StanglDepartment for Cardiology and Angiology, Center for Cardiovascular Research (CCR), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Uwe KühlDepartment of Cardiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Edith PodewskiDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Ingrid KindermannDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of the Saarland, 66421, Homburg, Saar, Germany.
Michael BöhmDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of the Saarland, 66421, Homburg, Saar, Germany.
Karen SliwaFaculty of Health Sciences, Hatter Institute of Cardiology Research in Africa, 2 Anzio Road, Chris Barnard Building, 4th Floor, Observatory, Cape Town, 7925, South Africa.
Denise Hilfiker-KleinerDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Johann BauersachsDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. bauersachs.johann@mh-hannover.de.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DELeipzig University · DESaarland University · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEHeidelberg University · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEParacelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität · DE

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 01KG1001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRight ventricular (RV) dysfunction predicts adverse outcome in peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM). We recently demonstrated beneficial effects associated with the prolactin release inhibitor bromocriptine at different doses when added to standard heart failure therapy in PPCM. Here, we evaluated for the first time the therapeutic potential of bromocriptine particularly in PPCM patients with RV involvement.

methodsIn this study, 40 patients with PPCM were included, of whom 24 patients had reduced RV ejection fraction (RVEF < 45%). We examined the effect of short-term (1W: bromocriptine, 2.5 mg, 7 days, n = 10) compared with long-term bromocriptine treatment (8W: 5 mg for 2 weeks followed by 2.5 mg for another 6 weeks, n = 14) in addition to guideline-based heart failure therapy in patients with an initial RVEF < 45% on the following outcomes: (1) change from baseline (Δ delta) in RVEF, (2) change from baseline in left ventricular EF (LVEF), and (3) rate of patients with full LV recovery (LVEF ≥ 50%) and (4) rate of patients with full RV recovery (RVEF ≥ 55%) at 6-month follow-up as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

resultsReduced RVEF at initial presentation was associated with a lower rate of full cardiac recovery at 6-month follow-up (patients with RV dysfunction: 58% vs. patients with normal RV function: 81%; p = 0.027). RVEF increased from 38 ± 7 to 53 ± 11% with a delta-RVEF of + 15 ± 12% in the 1W group, and from 35 ± 9 to 58 ± 7% with a Δ RVEF of + 23 ± 10% in the 8W group (Δ RVEF 1W vs 8W: p = 0.118). LVEF increased from 25 ± 8 to 46 ± 12% with a Δ LVEF of + 21 ± 11% in the 1W group, and from 22 ± 6 to 49 ± 10% with a Δ LVEF of + 27 ± 9% in the 8W group (Δ LVEF 1W vs 8W: p = 0.211). Full LV recovery was present in 50% of the 1W group and in 64% of the 8W group (p = 0.678). Full RV recovery was observed in 40% of the 1W group and in 79% of the 8W group (p = 0.092).

conclusionsDespite overall worse outcome in patients with RV dysfunction at baseline, bromocriptine treatment in PPCM patients with RV involvement was associated with a high rate of full RV and LV recovery, although no significant differences were observed between the short-term and long-term bromocriptine treatment regime. These findings suggest that bromocriptine in addition to standard heart failure therapy may be also effective in PPCM patients with biventricular impairment.

Indexed as

Peripartum PeriodPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularBromocriptineCardiomyopathiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugEchocardiographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart VentriclesHormone AntagonistsHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CinePregnancyProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVentricular Dysfunction, RightBromocriptineHormone AntagonistsBromocriptine therapyPeripartum cardiomyopathyRight ventricular dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID30121697
PMCPMC6394477
OpenAlexW2887542815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.