Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30121612›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Impact of adverse media reporting on public perceptions of the doctor-patient relationship in China: an analysis with propensity score matching method.

Jing Sun, Shiyang Liu, Qiannan Liu, Zijuan Wang, Jun Wang, Cecile Jia Hu, Mark Stuntz, Jing Ma, Yuanli Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jing SunSchool of Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4646-1174
Shiyang LiuSchool of Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Qiannan LiuSchool of Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zijuan WangSchool of Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jun WangInstitute of Health Economics and Finance, Central University of Economics and Finance, Beijing, China.
Cecile Jia HuDeerfield Institute, Shanghai, China.
Mark StuntzDeerfield Institute, New York, USA.
Jing MaHarvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Yuanli LiuSchool of Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNumerous studies indicate that the doctor-patient relationship in China is facing serious challenges. This study examined the impact of China Central Television's negative coverage of high medicines prices on both doctors' and patients' opinions of the doctor-patient relationship.

settingData were collected in a national survey conducted during 19 December 2016 to 11 January 2017 which targeted 136 public tertiary hospitals across the country.

participantsAll patients and doctors who submitted completed questionnaire were retrieved from the survey database.

interventionThe study used propensity score matching method to match the respondents before and after China Central Television's news report about high medicines prices which was given at 00:00 hours on 24 December 2016. OUTCOME MEASURE: Perception scores were calculated based on the five-point Likert scales to measure the opinions of the doctor-patient relationship.

resultsThe perception scores of the doctor-patient relationship were significantly affected by the negative media coverage for hospitalised patients, who scored 1.18 lower on the doctor-patient relationship following the report (p=0.006, 95% CI 0.34 to 2.02), and doctors who scored 5.96 points lower on the same scale (p<0.001, 95% CI 4.11 to 7.82). Score for the ambulatory patients was unaffected by exposure to the adverse news report (p=0.05).

conclusionChinese national media's reporting of adverse news negatively affected the perceptions of the doctor-patient relationship among both inpatients and doctors. A better understanding of the role of mass media in the formation of opinion and trust between doctors and patients may permit strategies for managing the media, in order to improve public perceptions of the doctor-patient relationship.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthMass MediaPhysician-Patient RelationsChinaHumansPropensity ScoreSurveys and Questionnaireshealth policypublic healthsocial medicine

Identifiers

PMID30121612
PMCPMC6104794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.