Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30121605›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Measuring health-related quality of life of care home residents, comparison of self-report with staff proxy responses for EQ-5D-5L and HowRu: protocol for assessing proxy reliability in care home outcome testing.

Adeela Usman, Sarah Lewis, Kathryn Hinsliff-Smith, Annabelle Long, Gemma Housley, Jake Jordan, Heather Gage, Tom Dening, John R F Gladman, Adam L Gordon

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Can survey data facilitate local priority setting? Experience from the Igunga and Nzega districts in Tanzania.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Adeela UsmanDivision of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby, UK.
Sarah LewisDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Kathryn Hinsliff-SmithDivision of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby, UK.
Annabelle LongDivision of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby, UK.
Gemma HousleyEast Midlands Academic Health Science Network, Nottingham, UK.
Jake JordanSchool of Economics, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Heather GageSchool of Economics, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Tom DeningInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
John R F GladmanDivision of Rehabilitation and Ageing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Adam L GordonDivision of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1676-9853

Funding

The Dunhill Medical Trust FOP1/0115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionResearch into interventions to improve health and well-being for older people living in care homes is increasingly common. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is frequently used as an outcome measure, but collecting both self-reported and proxy HRQoL measures is challenging in this setting. This study will investigate the reliability of UK care home staff as proxy respondents for the EQ-5D-5L and HowRu measures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective cohort study of a subpopulation of care home residents recruited to the larger Proactive Healthcare for Older People in Care Homes (PEACH) study. It will recruit residents ≥60 years across 24 care homes and not receiving short stay or respite care. The sample size is 160 participants. Resident and care home staff proxy EQ-5D-5L and HowRu responses will be collected monthly for 3 months. Weighted kappa statistics and intraclass correlation adjusted for clustering at the care home level will be used to measure agreement between resident and proxy responses. The extent to which staff variables (gender, age group, length of time caring, role, how well they know the resident, length of time working in care homes and in specialist gerontological practice) influence the level of agreement between self-reported and proxy responses will be considered using a multilevel mixed-effect regression model. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The PEACH study protocol was reviewed by the UK Health Research Authority and University of Nottingham Research Ethics Committee and was determined to be a service development project. We will publish this study in a peer-reviewed journal with international readership and disseminate it through relevant national stakeholder networks and specialist societies.

Indexed as

ProxyQuality of LifeSelf ReportAgedFemaleHomes for the AgedHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedNursing HomesQuality of Health CareReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesfrailtyhomes for the agedquality of life

Identifiers

PMID30121605
PMCPMC6104798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.