Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30121072›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2018

Pleth variability index or stroke volume optimization during open abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Hans Bahlmann, Robert G Hahn, Lena Nilsson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01458678 (Evaluation of Non Invasive Methods for Goal Directed Fluid Therapy During Abdominal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01458678 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of Non Invasive Methods for Goal Directed Fluid Therapy During Abdominal Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorLena NilssonRan2011 to 2015Enrolled150ConditionsPostoperative ComplicationsArmsVolume of colloid infusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Pulse Oximetry-A Perioperative Perspective.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hans BahlmannDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, University Hospital, 58185, Linköping, Sweden. hans.bahlmann@regionostergotland.se.ORCID 0000-0002-2658-2518
Robert G HahnDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University and Research Unit, Södertälje Hospital, 152 86, Södertälje, Sweden.
Lena NilssonDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, University Hospital, 58185, Linköping, Sweden.
Linköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of Goal Directed Fluid Therapy (GDFT) based on the non-invasive Pleth Variability Index (PVI) on clinical outcome after abdominal surgery has only sparingly been explored. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of intraoperative GDFT guided by PVI to a control group using esophageal Doppler on the incidence of complications and length of hospital stay after major abdominal surgery. We hypothesized that there would be no difference between the groups.

methodsThis was a randomized controlled trial in a Swedish university hospital between November 2011 and January 2015; 150 patients scheduled for open abdominal surgery lasting 2 h or more were included. Exclusion criteria included hepatic resection or severe cardiac arrhythmia. The patients were randomized 1:1 to either the intervention group or the control group. The intervention group received intraoperative GDFT by administering fluid boluses of 3 ml/kg tetrastarch aiming at a PVI value below 10%, while GDFT in the control group aimed for optimization of stroke volume as assessed with esophageal Doppler. Blinded observers assessed complications until postoperative day 30 using pre-defined definitions, as well as length of hospital stay.

resultsOne hundred and-fifty patients were randomized and 146 patients were available for the final data analysis. Median duration of surgery was 3 h. A total of 64 complications occurred in the PVI group (N = 74) and 70 in the Doppler group (N = 72) (p = 0.93). Median (IQR) length of stay was 8.0 (8.0) days in the PVI group and 8.0 (9.5) in the Doppler group (P = 0.57).

conclusionsNo difference in clinical outcome, as defined by number of postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay, was found when goal directed fluid therapy was applied using PVI as an alternative to esophageal Doppler. PVI appears to be an acceptable alternative to esophageal Doppler for goal directed fluid therapy during major open abdominal surgery.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT01458678 . Date of first registration October 20, 2011.

Indexed as

OximetryAbdomenEsophagusFemaleFluid TherapyHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsSingle-Blind MethodStroke VolumeSwedenTime FactorsUltrasonography, DopplerComplicationsDoppler ultrasonographyFluid therapyLaparotomyPhotoplethysmographyStroke volume

Identifiers

PMID30121072
PMCPMC6098821
OpenAlexW2885390235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.