Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30120736›Full record

ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2019

A Community-Partnered Approach to Developing Church-Based Interventions to Reduce Health Disparities Among African-Americans and Latinos.

Kathryn P Derose, Malcolm V Williams, Cheryl A Branch, Karen R Flórez, Jennifer Hawes-Dawson, Michael A Mata, Clyde W Oden, Eunice C Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Reaching Youth Through Faith Leaders: Evaluation of the Faith Matters! Initiative.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kathryn P DeroseRAND Corporation, 1776 Main St., Santa Monica, CA, 90401, USA. derose@rand.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7742-6024
Malcolm V WilliamsRAND Corporation, 1776 Main St., Santa Monica, CA, 90401, USA.
Cheryl A BranchLos Angeles Metropolitan Churches, Los Angeles, CA, 90011, USA.
Karen R FlórezCUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Jennifer Hawes-DawsonRAND Corporation, 1776 Main St., Santa Monica, CA, 90401, USA.
Michael A MataAzusa Pacific Seminary, Azusa, CA, 91702, USA.
Clyde W OdenBethel AME Church, Oxnard, CA, 93030, USA.
Eunice C WongRAND Corporation, 1776 Main St., Santa Monica, CA, 90401, USA.
RAND Corporation · USAzusa Pacific University · USBethel University · USThe Graduate Center, CUNY · US

Funding

A Multi-Ethnic Faith and Public Health Partnership to Reduce Health DisparitiesR24MD007943 · NIMHD · RAND CORPORATION · PI DEROSE, KATHRYN PITKIN · 2013 to 2015
$1.3M
NIMHD NIH HHS R24 MD007943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Faith and public health partnerships offer promise to addressing health disparities, but examples that incorporate African-Americans and Latino congregations are lacking. Here we present results from developing a multi-ethnic, multi-denominational faith and public health partnership to address health disparities through community-based participatory research (CBPR), focusing on several key issues: (1) the multi-layered governance structure and activities to establish the partnership and identify initial health priority (obesity), (2) characteristics of the congregations recruited to partnership (n = 66), and (3) the lessons learned from participating congregations' past work on obesity that informed the development of a multi-level, multi-component, church-based intervention. Having diverse staff with deep ties in the faith community, both among researchers and the primary community partner agency, was key to recruiting African-American and Latino churches. Involvement by local health department and community health clinic personnel provided technical expertise and support regarding health data and clinical resources. Selecting a health issue-obesity-that affected all subgroups (e.g., African-Americans and Latinos, women and men, children and adults) garnered high enthusiasm among partners, as did including some innovative aspects such as a text/e-mail messaging component and a community mapping exercise to identify issues for advocacy. Funding that allowed for an extensive community engagement and planning process was key to successfully implementing a CBPR approach. Building partnerships through which multiple CBPR initiatives can be done offers efficiencies and sustainability in terms of programmatic activities, though long-term infrastructure grants, institutional support, and non-research funding from local foundations and health systems are likely needed.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanHealth Status DisparitiesHispanic or LatinoPublic HealthCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity-Institutional RelationsFaith-Based OrganizationsHealthcare DisparitiesHealth EducationHealth FairsHealth PromotionHumansLos AngelesMass ScreeningObesityStakeholder ParticipationAfrican-AmericansChurch-based health promotionCommunity-based participatory researchCommunity partnershipsHealth disparitiesLatinos

Identifiers

PMID30120736
PMCPMC6378139
OpenAlexW2885197950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.