Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30120680›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2018

Comparison of two detection systems for circulating tumor cells among patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Menglin Bai, Benkui Zou, Zhendan Wang, Pang Li, Huansheng Wang, Yang Ou, Kai Cui, Jiasheng Bian, Sheng Li, Xiaobin Xu

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Menglin BaiQueen Mary School, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3349-337X
Benkui ZouDepartment of Urological Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Zhendan WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Pang LiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital Affiliated to Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Huansheng WangDepartment of Urological Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Yang OuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Kai CuiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Jiasheng BianDepartment of Urological Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Sheng LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, Shandong, China. drlisheng@sohu.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9012-7133
Xiaobin XuLaboratory of Fear and Anxiety Disorders, Institute of Life Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China. xuxiaobin70@hotmail.com.
Shandong Tumor Hospital · CNNanchang University · CNJinan University · CN

Funding

Department of Science and Technology of Shandong Province 2017CXGC1204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsDetection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in cancer patients has diagnostic and prognostic importance. However, the clinical implications of CTC detection in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are still unclear. In this study, we investigated the clinical significance of CTCs using two detection systems, the CellSearch system (CSS) and isolation by size of epithelial tumor cells (ISET), among RCC patients.

methodsWe recruited 36 RCC patients and 22 healthy volunteers as controls. Blood was drawn before treatment. Samples were analyzed using the CSS and ISET. We prospectively followed the RCC patients to determine overall and progression-free survival.

resultsWe did not detect CTCs in the control group using either the CSS or ISET. CTCs were detected in 7/36 patients (19.4%) using the CSS and in 13/36 patients (36.1%) using ISET, while circulating microemboli (CTMs) were detected in three patients (8.3%). The presence of ISET-detected CTCs correlated with clinical tumor node metastasis (TNM) stages, while the CSS-detected CTCs did not. After 36 months (median), CTCs detected by both methods failed to correlate with overall and progression-free survival among RCC patients.

conclusionWe discovered that ISET is more suitable than the CSS for detecting CTCs in RCC patients. The presence of CTCs/CTMs in RCC patients correlated with higher TNM stages, suggesting that the presence of CTCs could be a prognostic marker in RCC patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarcinoma, Renal CellCell SeparationCell SizeDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansImage CytometryKidney NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingProspective StudiesCellSearchCirculating tumor cellIsolation by size of epithelial tumor cellPrognosisRenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID30120680
OpenAlexW2886602577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.