ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2019
Return to Work of Cancer Survivors: Predicting Healthcare Professionals' Assumed Role Responsibility.
Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Returning to work is not enough for cancer survivors: vocational rehabilitation needs to consider work-related well-being.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Current status of support activities for balancing medical treatment and work by company size and their relationship with turnover rates.Journal of occupational health · 2026Article
- The association between attitude, perceived norm, and perceived behavioral control with the provision of Clinical Work-Integrating Care: A reasoned action approach.PEC innovation · 2025Article
- The extent to which medical specialists provide Clinical Work-Integrating Care (CWIC) and their perceived role-responsibility: a mixed-methods study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Work-related experiences and unmet needs of patients with a malignant glioma and relevant professionals: the BrainWork study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Readiness for return to work and its influencing factors among head and neck cancer patients: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- The role of general practitioners in the work guidance of cancer patients: views of general practitioners and occupational physicians.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023Article
- Perceptions and practice patterns of cancer survivorship care among Japanese gynecologic oncologists: The JGOG questionnaire survey.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2023Article
- Primary Care Physicians' Learning Needs in Returning Ill or Injured Workers to Work. A Scoping Review.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Work resumption and retention in patients with advanced cancer: Experiences and perspectives of general and occupational health care professionals.European journal of cancer care · 2022Article
- Understanding Cancer Survivors' Needs and Experiences Returning to Work Post-Treatment: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- Perceptions of clinical support for employed breast cancer survivors managing work and health challenges.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2021Article
- Development and evaluation of a training program for occupational health nurses regarding support for workers with cancer and their workplaces.Journal of occupational health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose Returning to work is highly beneficial for many cancer survivors. While research has documented the significance of healthcare professionals in the process of return to work (RTW), very little is known about those professionals' views regarding their responsibility for RTW. The purpose of the present study was to identify factors that predict the extent to which healthcare professionals view involvement in the RTW of cancer survivors as part of their role. Methods In a cross-sectional design, questionnaires measuring attitudes regarding personal role responsibility for RTW, team role responsibility for RTW and benefits of RTW were administered to 157 healthcare professionals who care for working-age cancer survivors: oncologists, occupational physicians, family physicians, oncology nurses, oncology social workers, and psychologists. Results Both belief in the benefits of RTW, and the view that RTW is the team responsibility of healthcare professionals working with cancer survivors, are positively related to viewing RTW as part of the responsibilities of one's personal professional role. Moderation analysis indicated that perception of team responsibility for RTW moderates the effect of the perceived benefits of RTW, such that the perception of benefits is significantly associated with personal role responsibility only when there is a low level of perceived team responsibility. Conclusions Issues related to RTW should be routinely included in basic and advanced training of healthcare professionals involved in the treatment of working-age cancer survivors, to increase awareness of this aspect of cancer survivors' well-being and position RTW as part of healthcare professionals' role responsibilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.