ArticleSurgical endoscopy2019
How accurate is preoperative colonoscopic localization of colonic neoplasia?
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Compliance and Quality of Endoscopic Tattooing in Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Audit.Cureus · 2026Article
- Current roles of colonoscopy in minimally invasive colorectal surgery: Preoperative guidance, intraoperative colonoscopy, and combined endoscopic-laparoscopic surgery.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- Evaluating the accuracy of preoperative endoscopic localization for colorectal cancer: post hoc analysis of a prospective study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Observational
- Article
- Implementation of Synoptic Reporting for Endoscopic Localization of Complex Colorectal Neoplasms.Cureus · 2024Article
- Endoscopy in surgery.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Rates and predictors of repeat preoperative endoscopy for elective colorectal resections: how can we avoid repeated procedures?Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- A Real-Time Endoscope Motion Tracker.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2022Article
- Clip or Tattooing: A Comparative Study for Preoperative Colon Cancer Endoscopic Localization.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Predictors and rates of prior endoscopic tattoo localization amongst individuals undergoing elective colorectal resections for benign and malignant lesions.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Application of nano-carbon and titanium clip combined labeling in robot-assisted laparoscopic transverse colon cancer surgery.BMC surgery · 2021Article
- Pre-colectomy location and TNM staging of colon cancer by the computed tomography colonography: a diagnostic performance study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Indocyanine green modified silica shells for colon tumor marking.Applied surface science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPreoperative colonoscopic localization for resection of colonic neoplasia, with or without tattooing for guidance, has been extensively used with variable accuracy. Difficulty in intraoperative identification of the lesion may lead to resection of an incorrect segment or to a more extensive resection than originally planned. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of preoperative colonoscopy in determining the site of the lesion.
methodsA prospectively collected IRB-approved institutional database was retrospectively queried for all consecutive patients who underwent an elective colon resection for neoplasia between 2013 and 2016. Excluded were patients without preoperative colonoscopy reports available for comparison or who underwent emergency surgery. Surgical plan based on preoperative colonoscopic localization with or without tattooing was compared to the final surgery and pathology reports.
results203 patients were included [mean age 68 (35-92) years; 102 males (50.2%)]. Preoperative colonoscopy was inaccurate in 16.7% (34 patients) leading to a change in the surgical plan. Patients with transverse or distal lesions were more likely to have a change in final surgical management compared to proximal sided lesions (29.7% vs. 3.9%, respectively; p < 0.001). Only 3.8% of the tattooed lesions could not be identified during surgery. Additional intraoperative colonoscopy was needed in 11 patients (5.5%) to verify exact lesion location. Average length of the resected segment was longer in patients who required a change in surgical plan (26.44 cm vs. 22.47 cm; p = 0.02).
conclusionInaccurate preoperative colonoscopic localization led to a change in surgical management in 16.7% of cases, especially in transverse or left sided lesions. Surgeons should consider these findings when planning colonic resections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30120582What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.