Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30120345›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of Computer-Aided Detection of tuberculosis on Chest radiography among private sector patients in Pakistan.

Syed Mohammad Asad Zaidi, Shifa Salman Habib, Bram Van Ginneken, Rashida Abbas Ferrand, Jacob Creswell, Saira Khowaja, Aamir Khan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. CAD4TB software updates: different triaging thresholds require caution by users and regulation by authorities.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Syed Mohammad Asad ZaidiCommunity Health Solutions, Karachi, 74000, Pakistan.
Shifa Salman HabibCommunity Health Solutions, Karachi, 74000, Pakistan. shifa.habib@chshealthcare.org.
Bram Van GinnekenRadboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Rashida Abbas FerrandLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
Jacob CreswellStopTB Partnership, 1214 Geneva, 1214, Vernier, Switzerland.
Saira KhowajaInteractive Research & Development, Karachi, 75190, Pakistan.
Aamir KhanInteractive Research & Development, Karachi, 75190, Pakistan.
Health Solutions (Sweden) · SEInteractive Research and Development · PKRadboud University Medical Center · NLUniversity of London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of digital CXR with automated computer-aided interpretation, has given impetus to the role of CXR in TB screening, particularly in low resource, high-burden settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CAD4TB as a screening tool, implemented in the private sector in Karachi, Pakistan. This study analyzed retrospective data from CAD4TB and Xpert MTB/RIF testing carried out at two private TB treatment and diagnostic centers in Karachi. Sensitivity, specificity, potential Xperts saved, were computed and the receiver operator characteristic curves were constructed for four different models of CAD4TB. A total of 6,845 individuals with presumptive TB were enrolled in the study, 15.2% of which had MTB + ve result on Xpert. A high sensitivity (range 65.8-97.3%) and NPV (range 93.1-98.4%) were recorded for CAD4TB. The Area under the ROC curve (AUC) for CAD4TB was 0.79. CAD4TB with patient demographics (age and gender) gave an AUC of 0.83. CAD4TB offered high diagnostic accuracy. In low resource settings, CAD4TB, as a triage tool could minimize use of Xpert. Using CAD4TB in combination with age and gender data enhanced the performance of the software. Variations in demographic information generate different individual risk probabilities for the same CAD4TB scores.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, Computer-AssistedPrivate SectorRadiography, ThoracicAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPakistanROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityTuberculosis, Pulmonary

Identifiers

PMID30120345
PMCPMC6098114
OpenAlexW2885509905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.