Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30120337›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2018

Preattentive and Predictive Processing of Visual Motion.

Constanze Schmitt, Steffen Klingenhoefer, Frank Bremmer

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. How vision governs the collective behaviour of dense cycling pelotons.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Constanze SchmittDept. Neurophysics, Philipps-Universität Marburg Karl-von-Frisch Str 8a, Marburg, D-35043, Germany. constanze.schmitt@physik.uni-marburg.de.
Steffen KlingenhoeferDept. Neurophysics, Philipps-Universität Marburg Karl-von-Frisch Str 8a, Marburg, D-35043, Germany.
Frank BremmerDept. Neurophysics, Philipps-Universität Marburg Karl-von-Frisch Str 8a, Marburg, D-35043, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1597-7407

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) CRC/TRR-135/A2Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) IRTG-1901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interaction with the environment requires fast and reliable sensory processing. The visual system is confronted with a continuous flow of high-dimensional input (e.g. orientation, color, motion). From a theoretical point of view, it would be advantageous if critical information was processed independent of attentional load, i.e. preattentively. Here, we hypothesized that visual motion is such a critical signal and aimed for a neural signature of its preattentive encoding. Furthermore, we were interested in the neural correlates of predictability of linear motion trajectories based on the presence or absence of preceding motion. We presented a visual oddball paradigm and studied event-related potentials (ERPs). Stimuli were linearly moving Gabor patches that disappeared behind an occluder. The difference between deviant and standard trials was a trajectory change which happened behind the occluder in deviant trials only, inducing a prediction error. As hypothesized, we found a visual mismatch negativity-component over parietal and occipital electrodes. In a further condition, trials without preceding motion were presented in which the patch just appeared from behind the occluder and, hence, was not predictable. We found larger ERP-components for unpredictable stimuli. In summary, our results provide evidence for a preattentive and predictive processing of linear trajectories of visual motion.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleMotion Perception

Identifiers

PMID30120337
PMCPMC6098031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.