Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30120320›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Klebsiella oxytoca expands in cancer cachexia and acts as a gut pathobiont contributing to intestinal dysfunction.

Sarah A Pötgens, Hélène Brossel, Martina Sboarina, Emilie Catry, Patrice D Cani, Audrey M Neyrinck, Nathalie M Delzenne, Laure B Bindels

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Host-derived nitrate fuels indole production byScience (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah A PötgensMetabolism and Nutrition Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Hélène BrosselMetabolism and Nutrition Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Martina SboarinaMetabolism and Nutrition Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Emilie CatryMetabolism and Nutrition Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Patrice D CaniMetabolism and Nutrition Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2040-2448
Audrey M NeyrinckMetabolism and Nutrition Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Nathalie M DelzenneMetabolism and Nutrition Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Laure B BindelsMetabolism and Nutrition Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. laure.bindels@uclouvain.be.ORCID 0000-0003-3747-3234
UCLouvain · BEWalloon Excellence in Lifesciences and Biotechnology · BE

Funding

European Research Council 336452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer cachexia is a complex multi-organ syndrome characterized by body weight loss, weakness, muscle atrophy and fat depletion. With a prevalence of 1 million people in Europe and only limited therapeutic options, there is a high medical need for new approaches to treat cachexia. Our latest results highlighted microbial dysbiosis, characterized by a bloom in Enterobacteriaceae and altered gut barrier function in preclinical models of cancer cachexia. They also demonstrated the potential of targeting the gut microbial dysbiosis in this pathology. However, the exact mechanisms underlying the gut microbiota-host crosstalk in cancer cachexia remain elusive. In this set of studies, we identified Klebsiella oxytoca as one of the main Enterobacteriaceae species increased in cancer cachexia and we demonstrated that this bacteria acts as a gut pathobiont by altering gut barrier function in cachectic mice. Moreover, we propose a conceptual framework for the lower colonization resistance to K. oxytoca in cancer cachexia that involves altered host gut epithelial metabolism and host-derived nitrate boosting the growth of the gut pathobiont. This set of studies constitutes a strong progression in the field of gut microbiota in cancer cachexia, by dissecting the mechanism of emergence of one bacterium, K. oxytoca, and establishing its role as a gut pathobiont in this severe disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsCachexiaCell Line, TumorGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractIntestinal DiseasesKlebsiella oxytocaMaleMiceNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID30120320
PMCPMC6098145
OpenAlexW2886815222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.