Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30120301›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Linear and Volumetric Mandibular Asymmetries in Adult Patients With Different Skeletal Classes and Vertical Patterns: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.

Luz Victoria Mendoza, Carlos Bellot-Arcís, José María Montiel-Company, Verónica García-Sanz, José Manuel Almerich-Silla, Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Three-dimensional mandibular characteristics in skeletal malocclusion : A cross-sectional study.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Three-dimensional quantification of skeletal midfacial complex symmetry.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luz Victoria MendozaDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Carlos Bellot-ArcísDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
José María Montiel-CompanyDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. jose.maria.montiel@uv.es.ORCID 0000-0002-3952-7681
Verónica García-SanzDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
José Manuel Almerich-SillaDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9605-3833
Vanessa Paredes-GallardoDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to quantify the height of the mandibular condyle and ramus, condylar volume, and the asymmetry index in adult patients of different sex, skeletal class and vertical pattern using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), and to determine whether there were differences between these groups. The study used CBCT scans of 159 patients with a mean age of 32.32 ± 8.31 years. InVivoDental® software was used to perform both linear (condylar, ramal, and total height) and condylar volume measurements. Linear and volumetric asymmetries were calculated. There were not significant differences between right and left sides. The mean value obtained for condyle height was 7.27 mm, ramus height 42.3 mm, total height 49.6 mm and condyle volume 1907.1 mm

Indexed as

AdultCone-Beam Computed TomographyFacial AsymmetryFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMandibleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30120301
PMCPMC6098024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.