Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30120260›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Patterns of early primary school-based literacy interventions among Pacific children from a nationwide health screening programme of 4 year olds.

Philip J Schluter, Jesse Kokaua, El-Shadan Tautolo, Rosalina Richards, Tufulasi Taleni, Hyun M Kim, Richard Audas, Brigid McNeill, Barry Taylor, Gail Gillon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Philip J SchluterUniversity of Canterbury - Te Whare Wānanga o Waitaha, School of Health Sciences, Christchurch, New Zealand. philip.schluter@canterbury.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0001-6799-6779
Jesse KokauaUniversity of Otago, Division of Health Sciences, Pacific Islands Research and Student Support Unit, Dunedin, New Zealand.
El-Shadan TautoloAuckland University of Technology, Centre for Pacific Health and Development Research, Auckland, New Zealand.
Rosalina RichardsUniversity of Otago, Dunedin School of Medicine, Department of the Dean, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Tufulasi TaleniUniversity of Canterbury - Te Whare Wānanga o Waitaha, College of Education, Health and Human Development, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Hyun M KimUniversity of Canterbury - Te Whare Wānanga o Waitaha, School of Health Sciences, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Richard AudasUniversity of Otago, Dunedin School of Medicine, Department of Women and Children's Health, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Brigid McNeillUniversity of Canterbury - Te Whare Wānanga o Waitaha, School of Teacher Education, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Barry TaylorUniversity of Otago, Dunedin School of Medicine, Department of the Dean, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Gail GillonUniversity of Canterbury - Te Whare Wānanga o Waitaha, College of Education, Health and Human Development, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Funding

Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) 15-02688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Literacy success is critical to unlocking a child's potential and enhancing their future wellbeing. Thus, the early identification and redressing of literacy needs is vital. Pacific children have, on average, the lowest literacy achievement levels in New Zealand. However, this population is very diverse. This study sought to determine whether the current national health screening programme of pre-school children could be used as an early detection tool of Pacific children with the greatest literacy needs. Time-to-event analyses of literacy intervention data for Pacific children born in years 2005-2011 were employed. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was fitted, and predictive assessment made using training and test datasets. Overall, 59,760 Pacific children were included, with 6,861 (11.5%) receiving at least one literacy intervention. Tongan (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23, 1.45) and Cook Island Māori (HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.21, 1.47) children were more likely to receive an intervention than Samoan children; whereas those children with both Pacific and non-Pacific ethnic identifications were less likely. However, the multivariable model lacked reasonable predictive power (Harrell's c-statistic: 0.592; 95% CI: 0.583, 0.602). Regardless, important Pacific sub-populations emerged who would benefit from targeted literacy intervention or policy implementation.

Indexed as

LiteracyChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMultivariate AnalysisNew ZealandProportional Hazards ModelsSchools

Identifiers

PMID30120260
PMCPMC6098071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.