ReviewThe oncologist2018
Adjuvant Anthracyclines in Breast Cancer: What Is Their Role?
Review in The oncologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does microtubule motor-mediated centrosomal dyshomeostasis confer chemoresistance in breast cancer?Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2025Pooled it
- Circular RNAs as novel biomarkers in triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review.Molecular biology reports · 2022Pooled it
- Evaluating the role of montelukast on doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Trial
- Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide followed by taxane as adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial.The oncologist · 2025Trial
- Multifunctional Nanoparticles Fabricated by Dispersion Polymerization for the Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Journal of biomedical nanotechnology · 2026Article
- Multifunctional chitosan-doxorubicin nanocarriers: advancing targeted breast cancer chemotherapy.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026Review
- Patient factors and modifications to intended chemotherapy for women with Stages I-IIIA breast cancer.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Effect of chemotherapy and different chemotherapeutic regimens on electrocardiographic parameters in breast cancer women: a retrospective and within-subject longitudinal study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Taxane/anthracycline combinations reduced incidence of breast cancer recurrence in young women across molecular subtypes: a real-world evidence of Taiwan from 2011 to 2019.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Network Pharmacology andCurrent pharmaceutical design · 2025Article
- Neutrophil Biomarkers Can Predict Cardiotoxicity of Anthracyclines in Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Applicability of Quantum Dots in Breast Cancer Diagnostic and Therapeutic Modalities-A State-of-the-Art Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Myogenic microRNAs as Therapeutic Targets for Skeletal Muscle Mass Wasting in Breast Cancer Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Changes in blood metabolomes as potential markers for severity and prognosis in doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity: a study in HER2-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer patients.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Nitric oxide nano-reactor DNMF/PLGA enables tumor vascular microenvironment and chemo-hyperthermia synergetic therapy.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Article
- Mid- and long-term risk of atrial fibrillation among breast cancer surgery survivors.BMC medicine · 2024Article
- Ki-67 Change in Anthracyline-containing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer.Current medical science · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anthracyclines have been a mainstay of breast cancer therapy for decades, with strong evidence demonstrating their impact on breast cancer survival. However, concerns regarding rare but serious long-term toxicities including cardiotoxicity and hematologic malignancies have driven interest in alternative adjuvant therapy options with more favorable toxicity profiles. This article provides an update of data that help inform clinicians of the role anthracyclines should play in adjuvant breast cancer therapy. Two recently reported large randomized trials-the Anthracycline in Early Breast Cancer and Western German Study Plan B studies-compared a taxane and cyclophosphamide regimen with an anthracycline, taxane, and cyclophosphamide regimen. Although the studies had conflicting results, together these studies suggest that the benefit of adjuvant anthracycline therapy over a nonanthracycline taxane-containing regimen is modest at best and may be primarily seen in patients with especially high-risk disease (i.e., triple-negative breast cancer, involvement of multiple lymph nodes). A third study-the MINDACT study-compared an anthracycline-based regimen to a nonanthracycline regimen, with similar outcomes in both groups. Despite the toxicities, no adjuvant breast cancer regimen has been shown to be superior to an anthracycline-taxane regimen in high-risk patients. These data can directly inform clinical decision-making in determining which patients warrant use of adjuvant anthracycline therapy. Future research may focus on confirming subgroups for whom it is reasonable to forgo adjuvant anthracyclines and validating predictive biomarkers or scores for anthracycline benefit. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In patients with early breast cancer, the choice of adjuvant chemotherapy should be based on its effectiveness in reducing breast cancer recurrences and its short- and long-term toxicities. Although adjuvant anthracycline and taxane chemotherapy has the most data supporting its effectiveness, anthracyclines carry a small but important increased risk for cardiotoxicity and leukemia. Two recent clinical trials help describe the degree of benefit with adjuvant anthracycline therapy compared with taxane therapy alone. They suggest that in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and limited lymph node involvement, nonanthracycline taxane-based adjuvant therapy may be adequate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.