Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30120158›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2018

Prognostic Understanding at Diagnosis and Associated Factors in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer and Their Caregivers.

Takashi Sato, Kenzo Soejima, Daisuke Fujisawa, Mari Takeuchi, Daisuke Arai, Ichiro Nakachi, Katsuhiko Naoki, Ichiro Kawada, Hiroyuki Yasuda, Kota Ishioka and 15 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06067087 (Prognostic Understanding in Patients Receiving Enhanced Supportive Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06067087 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Prognostic Understanding in Patients Receiving Enhanced Supportive Care (ProgESC Study)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2023 to 2024Enrolled91ConditionsAdvanced Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prognostic understanding among patients with advanced cancer recently referred to an enhanced supportive care service: results from the cross-sectional ProgESC study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Unrealistic expectations and disclosure of incurability in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Communication issues between caregivers and patients with concealment of advanced-stage cancer: A qualitative study.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Trust and Communication: Cornerstones of Care.North Carolina medical journal · 2023
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Deep convolutional neural network-based classification of cancer cells on cytological pleural effusion images.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  19. Associations of patient-reported care satisfaction with symptom burden and healthcare use in hospitalized patients with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Takashi SatoDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenzo SoejimaDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan ksoejima@cpnet.med.keio.ac.jp.
Daisuke FujisawaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mari TakeuchiPalliative Care Center, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke AraiDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ichiro NakachiPulmonary Division, Internal Medicine, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.
Katsuhiko NaokiDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ichiro KawadaDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki YasudaDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kota IshiokaDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigenari NukagaDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Keigo KobayashiDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Katsunori MasakiPulmonary Division, Internal Medicine, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.
Takashi InoueDepartment of Internal Medicine, Sano-kosei General Hospital, Sano, Japan.
Kota HikimaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Sano-kosei General Hospital, Sano, Japan.
Morio NakamuraDepartment of Medicine, Tokyo Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiko OhginoDepartment of Medicine, Tokyo Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshitaka OyamadaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Yohei FunatsuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi TerashimaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Tokyo Dental College, Chiba, Japan.
Naoki MiyaoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Nippon Kokan Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Koichi SayamaKawasaki Municipal Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Fumitake SaitoDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Eiju General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Fumio SakamakiDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoko BetsuyakuDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrognostic understanding in advanced cancer patients and their caregivers may have an impact on the delivery of effective care. The aims of this study were to explore prognostic understanding at diagnosis in both patients with advanced lung cancer and their caregivers and to investigate correlates of their understanding. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND

methodsA total of 193 patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer and their 167 caregivers were enrolled at 16 hospitals in Japan. We assessed their perceptions of prognosis and goals of therapy and examined their associations with their sociodemographic characteristics, clinical status, quality of life, mood symptoms, and the status of disclosure of information by their treating physicians.

resultsOne fifth of patients and caregivers (21.7% and 17.6%, respectively) mistakenly believed that the patients' cancer was "completely curable." Substantial proportions of them (16.9% and 10.3%, respectively) mistakenly believed that the primary goal of therapy was to remove all the cancer. Levels of anxiety and depression in both patients and caregivers were significantly higher among those who had accurate understanding of prognosis. In multivariate analyses, inaccurate perceptions of prognosis in patients were associated with sex, better emotional well-being, and lower lung cancer-specific symptom burden. Caregivers' inaccurate perceptions of patients' prognoses were associated with better performance status and better emotional well-being of patients.

conclusionSubstantial proportions of advanced lung cancer patients and their caregivers misunderstood their prognosis. Interventions to improve their accurate prognostic understanding should be developed with careful attention paid to its associated factors. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study demonstrated that substantial proportions of patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer and their caregivers had misunderstandings about their prognosis. Accurate perceptions of prognosis, which are indispensable in the delivery of effective care, were associated with elevated levels of anxiety and depression in both patients and caregivers, warranting psychosocial care and support for them immediately after diagnosis. Inaccurate perceptions of prognosis in patients were associated with better emotional well-being and lower lung cancer-specific symptom burden. Illness understanding in caregivers was associated with patients' physical and mental status. Those findings provide insight into how they obtain accurate illness understanding.

Indexed as

AgedCaregiversFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisQuality of LifeSurvival RateAdvanced lung cancerFamily caregiverIllness understandingPrognostic perceptionPsychological distressQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID30120158
PMCPMC6263137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.