ArticleBiophysical journal2018
Modeling In Vivo Interstitial Hydration-Pressure Relationships in Skin and Skeletal Muscle.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Subcutaneous interstitial pressure measurement during early septic shock: an exploratory study.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Models of Hydration Dependent Lymphatic Opening, Interstitial Fluid Flows and Ambipolar Diffusion.Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994) · 2025Article
- Mathematical model of volume kinetics and renal function after burn injury and resuscitation.Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries · 2021Article
- Optimization of traditional Chinese medicine rolling manipulation and pressure attenuation.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A theoretical understanding of hydrostatic pressure-fluid volume relationships, or equations of state, of interstitial fluid in skin and skeletal muscle through mathematical/physical modeling is lacking. Here, we investigate at the microscopic level forces that seem to underlie and determine the movements of fluid and solid tissue elements on the microscopic as well as on the macroscopic level. Effects that occur during variation of hydration due to interaction between expanding glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and the collagen interstitial matrix of tissue seem to be of major importance. We focus on these interactions that let effects from spherical GAGs expand and contract relative to collagen on the microscopic level as hydration changes and thereby generate a hydration-dependent electrostatic pressure on the extracellular matrix on the microscopic level. This pressure spreads to macroscopic levels and become a key factor for setting up equations of state for skin and skeletal muscle interstitia. The modeling for a combined skeletal muscle and skin tissue is one dimensional, i.e., a flat box that may mimic central transverse parts of tissue with more complex geometry. Incorporating values of GAG and collagen densities and fluid contents of skin and muscle tissues that are of an order of magnitude found in literature into the model gives interstitial hydrostatic pressure- fluid volume relationships for these tissues that agree well with experimental results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.