Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30119668›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2018

Assessment of effectiveness and safety of repeat administration of proinflammatory primed allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells in an equine model of chemically induced osteoarthritis.

Laura Barrachina, Ana Rosa Remacha, Antonio Romero, Arantza Vitoria, Jorge Albareda, Marta Prades, Mercedes Roca, Pilar Zaragoza, Francisco José Vázquez, Clementina Rodellar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura BarrachinaLaboratorio de Genética Bioquímica LAGENBIO - Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón IA2 - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón IIS, Universidad de Zaragoza, C/Miguel Servet, 177, 50013, Zaragoza, Spain.
Ana Rosa RemachaLaboratorio de Genética Bioquímica LAGENBIO - Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón IA2 - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón IIS, Universidad de Zaragoza, C/Miguel Servet, 177, 50013, Zaragoza, Spain.
Antonio RomeroLaboratorio de Genética Bioquímica LAGENBIO - Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón IA2 - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón IIS, Universidad de Zaragoza, C/Miguel Servet, 177, 50013, Zaragoza, Spain.
Arantza VitoriaLaboratorio de Genética Bioquímica LAGENBIO - Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón IA2 - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón IIS, Universidad de Zaragoza, C/Miguel Servet, 177, 50013, Zaragoza, Spain.
Jorge AlbaredaLaboratorio de Genética Bioquímica LAGENBIO - Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón IA2 - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón IIS, Universidad de Zaragoza, C/Miguel Servet, 177, 50013, Zaragoza, Spain.
Marta PradesLaboratorio de Genética Bioquímica LAGENBIO - Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón IA2 - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón IIS, Universidad de Zaragoza, C/Miguel Servet, 177, 50013, Zaragoza, Spain.
Mercedes RocaClínica Doctora Roca Diagnóstico Médico, Carrera del Sábado 4, local (Edificio Europa), 50006, Zaragoza, Spain.
Pilar ZaragozaLaboratorio de Genética Bioquímica LAGENBIO - Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón IA2 - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón IIS, Universidad de Zaragoza, C/Miguel Servet, 177, 50013, Zaragoza, Spain.
Francisco José VázquezLaboratorio de Genética Bioquímica LAGENBIO - Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón IA2 - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón IIS, Universidad de Zaragoza, C/Miguel Servet, 177, 50013, Zaragoza, Spain.
Clementina RodellarLaboratorio de Genética Bioquímica LAGENBIO - Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón IA2 - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón IIS, Universidad de Zaragoza, C/Miguel Servet, 177, 50013, Zaragoza, Spain. rodellar@unizar.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3289-2675
Universidad de Zaragoza · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

Gobierno de Aragón A17-LAGENBIOGobierno de Aragón Doctoral grantMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad AGL2011-28609Universidad de Zaragoza Doctoral grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed at assessing the effectiveness and safety of repeated administrations of allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) primed with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interferon-γ in an equine model of chemically-induced osteoarthritis. Arthritis was induced in both radio-carpal (RC)-joints by amphotericin-B in 18 ponies, divided into three groups depending on the treatment injected: MSC-naïve (n = 7), MSC-primed (n = 7) and control (n = 4). The study consisted of two phases and used one RC-joint of each animal in each phase, with four months time-lapse, in order to assess two end-points. Clinical, synovial, radiological and ultrasonographic follow-up was performed. At six months, animals were euthanized and both carpi were assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), gross anatomy, histopathology, histochemistry and gene expression.

resultsClinical and synovial inflammatory signs were quicker reduced in MSC-treated groups and repeated allogeneic administration did not produce adverse reactions, but MSC-primed group showed slight and transient local inflammation after second injection. Radiology and MRI did not show significant differences between treated and control groups, whereas ultrasonography suggested reduced synovial effusion in MSC-treated groups. Both MSC-treated groups showed enhanced cartilage gross appearance at two compared to six months (MSC-naïve, p < 0.05). Cartilage histopathology did not reveal differences but histochemistry suggested delayed progression of proteoglycan loss in MSC-treated groups. Synovium histopathology indicated decreased inflammation (p < 0.01) in MSC-primed and MSC-naïve at two and six months, respectively. At two months, cartilage from MSC-primed group significantly (p < 0.05) upregulated collagen type II (COL2A1) and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 and downregulated cyclooxygenase-2 and interleukin (IL)-1β. At six months, MSC-treatments significantly downregulated TNFα (p < 0.05), plus MSC-primed upregulated (p < 0.05) COL2A1, aggrecan, cartilage oligomeric protein, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 and TGF-β1. In synovium, both MSC-treatments decreased (p < 0.01) matrix metalloproteinase-13 expression at two months and MSC-primed also downregulated TNFα (p < 0.05) and IL-1β (p < 0.01).

conclusionsBoth MSC-treatments provided beneficial effects, mostly observed at short-term. Despite no huge differences between MSC-treatments, the findings suggested enhanced anti-inflammatory and regulatory potential of MSC-primed. While further research is needed to better understand these effects and clarify immunogenicity implications, these findings contribute to enlarge the knowledge about MSC therapeutics and how they could be influenced.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAmphotericin BAnimalsHorse DiseasesHorsesInflammationInterferon-gammaMaleOsteoarthritisSynovial MembraneTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAmphotericin BInterferon-gammaTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaCartilageHorseImmunogenicityImmunomodulationJoint pathologySynovial fluid

Identifiers

PMID30119668
PMCPMC6098603
OpenAlexW2885370893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.