Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30119632›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Service user and carer involvement in mental health care safety: raising concerns and improving the safety of services.

Kathryn Berzins, Gemma Louch, Mark Brown, Jane K O'Hara, John Baker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Conceptual and practical challenges associated with understanding patient safety within community-based mental health services.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Institutional Abuse, Neglect and Harm in UK Community Mental Health Services: A Scoping Review of the Peer-Reviewed Evidence.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Towards understanding and improving medication safety for patients with mental illness in primary care: A multimethod study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Family-centered collaborative care for patients with chronic mental illness: A systematic review.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A qualitative exploration of mental health service user and carer perspectives on safety issues in UK mental health services.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathryn BerzinsSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Baines Wing, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds, LS29JT, UK. K.M.Berzins@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5002-5212
Gemma LouchYorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Yorkshire & Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Temple Bank House, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.
Mark BrownSocial Spider CIC, The Mill, 7-11 Coppermill Lane, Walthamstow, London, E17 7HA, UK.
Jane K O'HaraYorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Yorkshire & Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Temple Bank House, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.
John BakerSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Baines Wing, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds, LS29JT, UK.
University of Leeds · GBBradford Royal Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious research into improving patient safety has emphasised the importance of responding to and learning from concerns raised by service users and carers. Expertise gained by the experiences of service users and their carers has also been seen as a potential resource to improve patient safety. We know little about the ease of raising concerns within mental health services, and the potential benefits of involving service users and carers in safety interventions. This study aimed to explore service user and carer perceptions of raising safety concerns, and service user, carer and health professional views on the potential for service user and carer involvement in safety interventions.

methodsUK service users, carers and health professionals ( n= 185) were recruited via social media to a cross-sectional survey focussed on raising concerns about safety issues and views on potential service user and carer participation in safety interventions. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and free text responses were coded into categories.

resultsThe sample of 185 participants included 90 health professionals, 77 service users and 18 carers. Seventy seven percent of service users and carers reported finding it very difficult or difficult to raise concerns. Their most frequently cited barriers to raising concerns were: services did not listen; concerns about repercussions; and the process of raising concerns, especially while experiencing mental ill health. There was universal support from health professionals for service user and carer involvement in safety interventions and over half the service users and carers supported involvement, primarily due to their expertise from experience.

conclusionsMental health service users and carers experience difficulties in raising safety concerns meaning that potentially useful information is being missed. All the health professionals and the majority of service users and carers saw potential for service users and carer involvement in interventions to improve safety, to ensure their experiences are taken into consideration. The results provide guidance for future research about the most effective ways of ensuring that concerns about safety can be both raised and responded to, and how service user and carer involvement in improving safety in mental health care can be further developed.

Indexed as

CaregiversMental Health ServicesQuality ImprovementAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SafetySurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomYoung AdultAttitude of health personnelCaregiversHealth services researchInpatientsMental health servicesPatient safetySurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID30119632
PMCPMC6098618
OpenAlexW2887029315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.