Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30119089›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation2019

Complete Restoration of Respiratory Muscle Function in Three Subjects With Spinal Cord Injury: Pilot Interventional Clinical Trial.

Anthony F DiMarco, Robert T Geertman, Kutaiba Tabbaa, Krzysztof E Kowalski

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01659541 (Spinal Cord Stimulation With Wire Leads to Restore Cough), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01659541 nacompletednot on this map

Spinal Cord Stimulation With Wire Leads to Restore Cough

TypeinterventionalSponsorMetroHealth Medical CenterRan2015 to 2021Enrolled12ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries, Spinal Cord Diseases, Paralysis, Central Nervous System DiseasesArmsExpiratory muscle stimulator, Implantation of device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The phrenic neuromuscular system.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anthony F DiMarcoFrom the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AFD), Department of Neurosurgery (RTG), Department of Anesthesiology (KT), Department of Medicine (KEK), and MetroHealth Research Institute (AFD, KEK), Case Western Reserve University, MetroHealth Medical Center; and Research Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center (KEK), Cleveland, Ohio.
Robert T Geertman
Kutaiba Tabbaa
Krzysztof E Kowalski

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR000439 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$50.0M
Evaluation of Spinal Cord Stimulation Using Wire Leads to Restore an Effective CoU01NS083696 · NINDS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DIMARCO, ANTHONY F. · 2013 to 2018
$2.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000439NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS083696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of complete restoration of respiratory muscle function in subjects with spinal cord injury.

methodsThis was an interventional study investigating three subjects maintained on a diaphragm pacing system who were implanted with the spinal cord stimulation system to restore cough. Peak expiratory airflow and airway pressure generation were the primary physiologic outcome measures; an assessment of the degree of difficulty in raising secretions was the primary clinical outcome measure.

resultsMean peak expiratory airflow and airway pressure generation during spontaneous efforts were 1.7 ± 0.2 L/s and 31 ± 7 cmH2O, respectively. When spinal cord stimulation was applied after pacing volume associated with the subject's maximum inspiratory effort and synchronized with the subject's maximum expiratory effort, peak expiratory airflow and airway pressure generation were 9.0 ± 1.9 L/s and 90 ± 6 cmH2O, respectively (P < 0.05). Moreover, each subject experienced much greater ease in raising secretions and marked improvement in the ease in raising secretions compared with other methods.

conclusionsComplete restoration of respiratory muscle function can be safely and effectively achieved in the same individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal cord stimulation results in peak expiratory airflow and airway pressure generation characteristic of a normal cough, whereas diaphragm pacing was successful in maintaining patients off mechanical ventilation.

Indexed as

AdultBreathing ExercisesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeak Expiratory Flow RatePilot ProjectsRecovery of FunctionRespirationRespiratory MusclesSpinal Cord InjuriesSpinal Cord StimulationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30119089
PMCPMC8883340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.