Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30118972›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in psychology2019

A review of opioid addiction genetics.

Richard C Crist, Benjamin C Reiner, Wade H Berrettini

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Genetic and Epigenetic Approaches to Opioid Use Disorder.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Similarities and Differences in Genetics.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard C CristCenter for Neurobiology and Behavior, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: crist@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Benjamin C ReinerCenter for Neurobiology and Behavior, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Wade H BerrettiniCenter for Neurobiology and Behavior, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY-PREDOCTORALT32MH014654 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BERRETTINI, WADE H · 1985 to 2021
$5.0M
Supplemental Application for Clinical and Genetic Risk Profile of Opioid Use DisorderR01DA044015 · NIDA · GEISINGER CLINIC · PI BERRETTINI, WADE H, ROBISHAW, JANET D · 2017 to 2021
$4.5M
The role of the delta-opioid receptor gene, OPRD1, in opioid addiction treatmentK01DA036751 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CRIST, RICHARD C. · 2014 to 2018
$717k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA036751NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA044015NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH014654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opioid use disorder (OUD) affects millions of people worldwide and the risk of developing the disorder has a significant genetic component according to twin and family studies. Identification of the genetic variants underlying this inherited risk has focused on two different methods: candidate gene studies and genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The most studied candidate genes have included the mu-opioid receptor (OPRM1), the delta-opioid receptor (OPRD1), the dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Variants in these genes have been associated with relatively small, but reproducible, effects on OUD risk. More recently, GWAS have identified potential associations with variants in KCNG2, KCNC1, CNIH3, APBB2, and RGMA. In total the genetic associations identified so far explain only a small portion of OUD risk. GWAS of OUD is still in the early stages when compared to studies of other psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia, which have found many relevant variants with small effect sizes only after large meta-analyses. Substantial increases in cohort sizes will likely be necessary in the OUD field to achieve similar results. In addition, it will be important for future studies of OUD to incorporate rare variants, epigenetics, and gene × environment interactions into models in order to better explain the observed heritability.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyHumansMultifactorial InheritanceOpioid-Related DisordersReceptors, Opioid, deltaReceptors, Opioid, muOPRD1 protein, humanOPRM1 protein, humanReceptors, Opioid, deltaReceptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

PMID30118972
PMCPMC6368898
OpenAlexW2902867270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.