Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30118745›Full record

ReviewGastroenterology2018

Reserve Stem Cells in Intestinal Homeostasis and Injury.

Eric D Bankaitis, Andrew Ha, Calvin J Kuo, Scott T Magness

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Intestinal Stem Cells: Regulation, Plasticity, and Therapeutic Potential.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Review
  2. Long Noncoding RNANon-coding RNA · 2026
    Article
  3. Metrnl in mitigating radiation enteritisActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Ghrelin Induces CluInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Proton FLASH Exposure Preserves Gut Commensal Microbiomes and Spares Intestinal Stem Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric D BankaitisDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Andrew HaDepartment of Medicine, Hematology Division, and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Calvin J KuoDepartment of Medicine, Hematology Division, and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Electronic address: cjkuo@stanford.edu.
Scott T MagnessDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Joint Departments of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill/North Carolina State University, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: magness@med.unc.edu.

Funding

Supplement to Enhance Wellness and Resiliency in the Graduate EnvironmentT32GM007276 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MORRISON, ASHBY J. · 1985 to 2023
$32.9M
Intestinal Stem Cell Consortium Coordinating CenterU01DK085532 · NIDDK · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI NILAND, JOYCE CAROL · 2009 to 2018
$6.5M
DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN INTESTINAL SIMULACRAR01DK109559 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ALLBRITTON, NANCY L., BULTMAN, SCOTT J · 2015 to 2019
$5.2M
Limited Competition for the Continuation of the Intestinal Stem Cell Consortium Coordinating CenterU24DK085532 · NIDDK · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI NILAND, JOYCE CAROL · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
Genetic Control of Intestinal Epithelial Stem Cell Maintenance & DifferentiationR01DK091427 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MAGNESS, SCOTT T · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
Genetic regulation of active and reserve intestinal stem cell statesR01DK115806 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MAGNESS, SCOTT T · 2019 to 2022
$1.5M
Sox9 Expression-Thresholds Govern Reserve and Active Intestinal Stem Cell FunctionsF32DK115016 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BANKAITIS, ERIC DANIEL · 2017 to 2018
$120k
NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK115016NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK091427NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK109559NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK115806NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK085532NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK085532NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renewal of the intestinal epithelium occurs approximately every week and requires a careful balance between cell proliferation and differentiation to maintain proper lineage ratios and support absorptive, secretory, and barrier functions. We review models used to study the mechanisms by which intestinal stem cells (ISCs) fuel the rapid turnover of the epithelium during homeostasis and might support epithelial regeneration after injury. In anatomically defined zones of the crypt stem cell niche, phenotypically distinct active and reserve ISC populations are believed to support homeostatic epithelial renewal and injury-induced regeneration, respectively. However, other cell types previously thought to be committed to differentiated states might also have ISC activity and participate in regeneration. Efforts are underway to reconcile the proposed relatively strict hierarchical relationships between reserve and active ISC pools and their differentiated progeny; findings from models provide evidence for phenotypic plasticity that is common among many if not all crypt-resident intestinal epithelial cells. We discuss the challenges to consensus on ISC nomenclature, technical considerations, and limitations inherent to methodologies used to define reserve ISCs, and the need for standardized metrics to quantify and compare the relative contributions of different epithelial cell types to homeostatic turnover and post-injury regeneration. Increasing our understanding of the high-resolution genetic and epigenetic mechanisms that regulate reserve ISC function and cell plasticity will help refine these models and could affect approaches to promote tissue regeneration after intestinal injury.

Indexed as

HomeostasisCalcium-Binding ProteinsCell DifferentiationCell PlasticityCell ProliferationGenetic MarkersHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsIntestinal MucosaMembrane ProteinsRegenerationSOX9 Transcription FactorStem CellsCalcium-Binding ProteinsDLK1 protein, humanGenetic MarkersIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane ProteinsSOX9 protein, humanSOX9 Transcription FactorIntestineRegenerationStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID30118745
PMCPMC7493459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.