Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30118582›Full record

Trial reportAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2019

Randomized Clinical Trial of Intravenous Acetaminophen as an Analgesic Adjunct for Older Adults With Acute Severe Pain.

Andrew K Chang, Polly E Bijur, Ashar Ata, Caron Campbell, Scott Pearlman, Deborah White, Andrew Chertoff, Andrew Restivo, E John Gallagher

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew K ChangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-8123-4006
Polly E BijurDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Ashar AtaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY.
Caron CampbellDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Scott PearlmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Deborah WhiteDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Andrew ChertoffDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Andrew RestivoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
E John GallagherDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USAlbany Medical Center Hospital · US

Funding

Optimizing Emergency Department Treatment of Older Adults with Acute PainK23AG033100 · NIA · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI CHANG, ANDREW KENNETH · 2011 to 2015
$669k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG033100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOlder adults are at risk for undertreatment of pain. We examined intravenous (IV) acetaminophen as an analgesic adjunct to IV opioids in the care of older emergency department (ED) patients with acute severe pain.

methodsThis was a randomized clinical trial conducted in two EDs in the Bronx, New York. Eligible adults aged 65 years and older with acute severe pain were randomized to 0.5 mg of IV hydromorphone and 1 g of IV acetaminophen or 0.5 mg of IV hydromorphone and 100 mL of normal saline placebo. The primary outcome was the between group difference in improvement of numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores at 60 minutes. Secondary outcomes were the between-group differences in the proportion of patients who chose to forgo additional pain medications at 60 minutes; the proportion who developed side effects; the proportion who required rescue analgesia; and between-group differences in NRS pain scores at 5, 15, 30, and 45 minutes.

resultsEighty-one patients were allocated to each arm. Eighty patients in the IV acetaminophen arm and 79 patients in the placebo arm had sufficient data for analysis. At 60 minutes, patients in the hydromorphone + IV acetaminophen group improved by 5.7 NRS units while those in the hydromorphone + placebo group improved by 5.2 NRS units, for a difference of 0.6 NRS units (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.4 to 1.5). A total of 28.7% of patients in the hydromorphone + IV acetaminophen group wanted more analgesia at 60 minutes versus 29.1% in the hydromorphone + placebo group, for a difference of -0.4% (95% CI = -14.3% to 13.5%). These differences were neither clinically nor statistically significant. Safety profiles were similar in both groups.

conclusionIn this randomized clinical trial, the addition of IV acetaminophen to IV hydromorphone as an adjunctive analgesic for acute, severe, pain in older adults provided neither clinically nor statistically superior pain relief when compared to hydromorphone alone within the first hour of treatment.

Indexed as

AcetaminophenAcute PainAdministration, IntravenousAgedAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidChemotherapy, AdjuvantDouble-Blind MethodEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansHydromorphoneMalePain ManagementPain MeasurementTreatment OutcomeAcetaminophenAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidHydromorphone

Identifiers

PMID30118582
PMCPMC6378123
OpenAlexW2886456490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.