Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30118476›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

The role of curvature feedback in the energetics and dynamics of lamprey swimming: A closed-loop model.

Christina L Hamlet, Kathleen A Hoffman, Eric D Tytell, Lisa J Fauci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Multisensory feedback makes swimming circuits robust against spinal transection and enables terrestrial crawling in elongate fish.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Roles for cerebellum and subsumption architecture in central pattern generation.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024
    Review
  4. Proprioceptive feedback amplification restores effective locomotion in a neuromechanical model of lampreys with spinal injuries.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christina L HamletDepartment of Mathematics, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6559-1898
Kathleen A HoffmanDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Eric D TytellDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Lisa J FauciDepartment of Mathematics, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4477-8178

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Like other animals, lampreys have a central pattern generator (CPG) circuit that activates muscles for locomotion and also adjusts the activity to respond to sensory inputs from the environment. Such a feedback system is crucial for responding appropriately to unexpected perturbations, but it is also active during normal unperturbed steady swimming and influences the baseline swimming pattern. In this study, we investigate different functional forms of body curvature-based sensory feedback and evaluate their effects on steady swimming energetics and kinematics, since little is known experimentally about the functional form of curvature feedback. The distributed CPG is modeled as chains of coupled oscillators. Pairs of phase oscillators represent the left and right sides of segments along the lamprey body. These activate muscles that flex the body and move the lamprey through a fluid environment, which is simulated using a full Navier-Stokes model. The emergent curvature of the body then serves as an input to the CPG oscillators, closing the loop. We consider two forms of feedback, each consistent with experimental results on lamprey proprioceptive sensory receptors. The first, referred to as directional feedback, excites or inhibits the oscillators on the same side, depending on the sign of a chosen gain parameter, and has the opposite effect on oscillators on the opposite side. We find that directional feedback does not affect beat frequency, but does change the duration of muscle activity. The second feedback model, referred to as magnitude feedback, provides a symmetric excitatory or inhibitory effect to oscillators on both sides. This model tends to increase beat frequency and reduces the energetic cost to the lamprey when the gain is high and positive. With both types of feedback, the body curvature has a similar magnitude. Thus, these results indicate that the same magnitude of curvature-based feedback on the CPG with different functional forms can cause distinct differences in swimming performance.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCentral Pattern GeneratorsComputer SimulationFeedbackLampreysLocomotionModels, BiologicalMusclesNerve NetSpinal CordSwimming

Identifiers

PMID30118476
PMCPMC6114910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.