ArticleIslets2018
Patient and family expectations of beta-cell replacement therapies in type 1 diabetes.
Article in Islets, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards curing type 1 diabetes: Prospects and challenges of allogeneic or xenogeneic donor islet cell transplantation.World journal of transplantation · 2025Review
- Attitudes toward pig islet xenotransplantation for type 1 diabetes: a scoping review.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2025Article
- Research progress of autoimmune diseases based on induced pluripotent stem cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Whole-Organ Pancreas and Islets Transplantations in UK: An Overview and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Xenotransplantation: A historical-ethical account of viewpoints.Xenotransplantation · 2023Review
- What does it take to consent to islet cell xenotransplantation?: Insights from an interview study with type 1 diabetes patients and review of the literature.BMC medical ethics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNew methods of beta-cell replacement have been developed to maintain excellent glycemic control, improve quality of life, and even eliminate insulin injections in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Previously, we demonstrated that being insulin-free is the strongest motivation for accepting a newly developed therapy. Multiple allogeneic islet transplantations with immunosuppression using a human donor is the best option to be insulin-free, but the necessity for immunosuppression and donor shortage are major issues. However, these issues have been improved with scientific progress. The aim of this study was to investigate the opinions of patients and their families about the current progress.
methodsWe conducted a questionnaire survey of T1DM patients (n = 47) and their family members (n = 49) about newly developed therapies: single and multiple allogeneic islet transplantation, single and multiple encapsulated allogeneic islet transplantation, single and multiple xenogeneic islet transplantation, and induced pluripotent stem cell therapy.
resultsMore than 90% of respondents wished to be insulin-free and have stable glycemic control. More than 90% of respondents accepted at least one of the new therapies. The current standard treatment multiple allogeneic islet transplantation was not well accepted or favored.
conclusionsThe next generation of treatments, including xenotransplantation and induced pluripotent stem cell therapy, were more acceptable and favorable. Even though the majority of patients wish to become insulin-free, it is not sufficiently strong motivation for accepting newly developed treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.