Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30117760›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of yoga therapy2018

A Feasibility Study of Restorative Yoga Versus Vigorous Yoga Intervention for Sedentary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Survivors.

Kaitlyn Lapen, Lara Benusis, Stephanie Pearson, Benjamin Search, Marci Coleton, Q Susan Li, Daniel Sjoberg, Jason Konner, Jun J Mao, Gary Deng

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of yoga therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kaitlyn Lapen1. College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago.
Lara Benusis2. Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Columbia University, New York.
Stephanie Pearson3. Integrative Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
Benjamin Search3. Integrative Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
Marci Coleton3. Integrative Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
Q Susan Li3. Integrative Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
Daniel Sjoberg4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
Jason Konner5. Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
Jun J Mao3. Integrative Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
Gary Deng3. Integrative Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USIllinois College · USNeurobehavioral Systems · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Summer research experiences for medical students supervised by faculty mentorsR25CA020449 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Charlotte Eielson Ariyan · 1985 to 2026
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R25 CA020449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yoga has been shown to improve cancer survivors' quality of life, yet regular yoga practice is a challenge for those who are sedentary. We conducted a pilot randomized controlled study to assess feasibility and adherence of two types of yoga intervention among sedentary cancer survivors. Sedentary breast and ovarian cancer survivors were randomized to practice either restorative yoga (minimal physical exertion, Group R) or vigorous yoga (considerable physical exertion, Group V) in three 60-minute supervised sessions a week for 12 weeks, followed by 12 weeks of home practice. Accrual, adherence, and attendance rates were assessed. Of the 226 eligible patients, 175 (77%) declined to participate in the study, citing time commitment and travel as the most common barriers. Forty-two subjects consented to participate in the study. Of the 35 participants who began the intervention (20 in Group R and 15 in Group V), adherence rate (percentage remaining in the study at week 12) was 100% and 87%, respectively. Rate of adequate attendance (more than 66% of the scheduled supervised sessions) was 85% and 73%, respectively. Rate of completion of the home practice period was 85% and 77%, respectively. In this study, sedentary cancer survivors were able to adhere to a long-term, regular yoga regimen. The rate of adequate attendance was higher for restorative yoga. Future studies for sedentary patients should focus on reducing time commitment and travel requirements to improve recruitment, and on using restorative yoga as a more feasible intervention for this population.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsOvarian NeoplasmsYogaFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansQuality of Lifecancer survivorsfeasibilityRestorative Yogasedentary

Identifiers

PMID30117760
PMCPMC7470896
OpenAlexW2886553218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.